2 of 43

Yes

Write now Article Tools

Speaking out against the policies and actions of a current president by a former president, regardless of political party, should not only be considered right and ethical, it should also be considered an obligation if those actions are clearly not in the best interest of the security, economic well-being and sovereignty of the nation.

We are now living in the most dangerous times imaginable. This is an era of uncertainty, marked by treacherous foreign leaders with uncertain ambitions, and the potential for unimaginable world-wide destruction without notice on the whim of these same megalomaniacs. The many webs of intrigue are entangling our nation over such issues as collapsing natural resources, global warming, international trade, border disputes, genocide, religious racialism and slavery. Admittedly, these are pretty depressing thoughts and may raise objections from some, but they exist nevertheless.

For the purpose of this article, the focus is on the role of the President of the United States. It is important and imperative to note, however, that no President governs the Nation alone. He (or she) each have their own self-appointed and approved Cabinet of advisers as well as their party strategists and an inner-circle composed of trusted friends championing compatible interests, and of course, family.

There are many factors that have given rise to this dooms-day conjunction of global stress. Most are global in scale and beyond the ability of the individual to have any corrective impact on. Many are due to the societal and economic interests that we share in common. Many are due to the ebb and flow of ideologies, social activism, and religious fanaticism that arise when there is unresolved oppression of one group or another. It is the role and responsibility of the world's leaders to address these issues in the interest of the common good and their particular national interest.

The actions taken in the past by previous Presidents have brought the United States into war and to the moon. They have cumulated in greater freedom, such as the civil rights movement, and less freedom at the same time, such as the contentious Patriot Act. They have created great economic progress resulting in greater prosperity for some at the expense of others. They have negotiated treaties and agreements which favor one country's economy, sell the rationale for the treaty to the public, and then struggle for a decade or so until the negative fallout from the agreement is compensated

• 1
• 2
• next page >>

Add your voice

Know something about Should former US presidents speak out against a current president??
We want to hear your view. Write now!