There are 34 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #18 by Helium's members.
Hold a series of summits, both domestically and internationally. You start with the recognition that the American effort is unsustainable in its present form, but you must put the best face possible on things. It should not be an unilateral ending, but rather a passing of the baton to others who are more eminently qualified and positioned to take the effort down the final stretch. America can remain engaged, without ruling the roost.
The message that could be publicized is that America won an honorable victory, by deposing Saddam and beginning transition towards the new Iraq. Ceremonies could be planned with pomp and circumstance to make it clear there are Iraqis appreciated America's help ... perhaps among the Kurds, Sunnis and Shiites separately. Troops in areas with unacceptably high violence should be redeployed ASAP, as non-American replacements arrive on site.
America should be open to all possible scenarios, save al-Qaeda. Iran, Syria, Hezbollah, Hamas and Fatah, Libya, Sudan, etc. should not be ruled out. This is likely to be an extremely challenging diplomatic effort and America should be willing to consider inducements for being extracted from the mess of our own creation. The assumption is that replacements will be Muslim and ideally should speak the local language in the area deployed.
Economic development will be required and America took on an implied responsibility by spearheading the invasion and occupation. Financial controls should be be designed to ensure that the money goes where intended. Sub-minimum wages should be guaranteed to anyone who shows up and works. Public works projects should be the focus, so that the Iraqis can see the progress. Arabic intelligence services are needed to ensure security and provided with tools.
At America and the local people's discretion, American bases may remain in areas not plagued with unacceptably high violence, such as Kurdistan (and possibly al-Anbar, etc.) Thus, America could continue to provide deterrence for any foreign power invasions, but stay out of day-to-day patrol and security operations.
A confederation concept seems practical, with right of opting out, after x years, if a region is dissatisfied with results. The confederation government would be responsible for coordinating foreign policies and relations among the different regions. Each region could have effective autonomy in internal affairs, including security, economic development and possibly some
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Marie Devine
Although it looks like there is no victory available in the war on terror in the Iraq War, there are things written i... read more
WASHINGTON Respected Republicans such as Dick Lugar (R-IN), George Voinovich (R-OH), Olympia Snowe (R-WA) and Pete Do... read more
by Luke Bawden
A war of words and thats the only war there should ever be. As a New Zealand citizen I believe we should table a r... read more
So many experts! So few people who have the slightest idea of what is involved in ending the war in Iraq. Suggesting ... read more
There is a very big difference between trying to end the war, and trying to win the war. Until that difference is cry... read more
View All Articles on:
How to end the war in Iraq
Add your voice
Know something about How to end the war in Iraq?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Already a member? Log in.
Cast your vote!
Click for your side. Must be logged in.
Featured Partner
Teachers Without Borders (TWB)
Teachers Without Borders (TWB) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse TWB...more
hide