There are 38 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #8 by Helium's members.
Results so far:
| No | 36% | 128 votes | Total: 355 votes | |
| Yes | 64% | 227 votes |
I soon had to listen a lecture on the diplomacy in science. In physics to be precise. I came out of it extremely worried.
To answer simply on the debate- No.
To answer in lengthier way- Dream on.
Science, as close to full devotion it seems, is full of riffs and human ground-sea-swells. Even if we accept observation can be clean and free of prejudices (which of course can not happen, because one always sees what he/she expect to see-the one that broke free of the chain,made the real discoveries), we get on the publishing end. Where people are like sharks. Where you need to bite your way to the cover. Think I'm kidding? Think again.
I have this true story. A man I know, lead 5 years long fight with the editors of a scientific magazine, because he was in bad relations with some big in his field. In the end he showed he's right. But he never published that particular. Why? Because when we're not slaves to political ideologies, we're slave to our ego. And to defeat the Ego, that's hard. It requires patience, lots of paper and famous friends. And in the end, we all lose.
Science should be free of all this, it should make us show only the best of us. But when you need to fight for funding, for your post in the University, for respect from the editors, it's difficult to act the way you should.
To separate science from ideology, you'll have to create a new human. A free human. One that have the courage to stand for what he/she believes in, and the security to risk fighting it. Until we're dependent, we can never be completely free. We always have to think twice before acting. We always have to reconsider the implications of what we said. And be nice and charming with the"big names". To be well educated and really important "whores". Sorry for the word. But it's not far from the reality. We are too dependent on public opinion and that's bad for the progress.
Long live internet and the free servers, because they are the path to the freedom.
Learn more about this author, Denitsa Staicova.
Click here to send author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by V R Rutledge
When science was in its infancy, ideology was thousands of years old. Science was supposed to be the opposite of ide...read more
by Briar Shaw
We tend to assume that science is different to ideology, that it is more real or valid, because it deals in physical ...read more
by Aubrey Chen
Pure science and pure ideology are two very separate, yet overlapping, entities. Neither one exists in the world - sc...read more
by Doc Meson
Yes, we can seperate science from ideology. An ideology is a collection of ideas. From this definition, using it s...read more
Add your voice
Know something about Can we separate science from ideology??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
The Project on Government Oversight (POGO)
The Project on Government Oversight (POGO) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. ...more
hide