Channel Button

There are 17 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #1 by Helium's members.

Sports & Recreation   >

Sports & Recreation (Other)

Get a Widget for this title

Is the new 'Twenty20' cricket version a curse or a boon?

Twenty20 cricket is an interesting concept, however at the end of the day, it comes a distant third behind Test Match cricket (first) and limited-overs cricket (second).

The best cricketers and best teams do not necessarily win Twenty20 matches, which is why there's every possibility that at the inaugural Twenty20 World Cup in September in South Africa, we may very well see a nation other than Australia crowned champions.

In my opinion, this shows true the facts that Twenty20 cricket isn't all that special. It basically comes down to luck. You still need to be a fairly decent cricketer to be good at Twenty20 at an international or intermural level, however having said that, a talented cricketer from Zimbabwe could easily out-score a much more talented cricketer from Australia in this form of cricket.

There's no time for strategy, for tactics to come to the fore, it's just a case of "bash it and hope". That's the batsmen's lot. For the bowlers, again all they can do is attempt yorkers every ball, and just hope they bowl beautiful line and length every time, which is not going happen, no matter how much you hope or try. Thus, it's simply not a game of true cricketing skill or ability.

I think you may even find, in coming years, that each nation has specialist Twenty20 cricketers representing them in this form of the game, cricketers who do not feature in their Test Match or limited overs sides.

Twenty20 has to evolve this way, as brilliant Test cricketers are just not going to be brilliant Twenty20 cricketers, they are just two completely different games.

At this stage, Twenty20 is all the rage with the "young-moderns" in traditional cricketing societies, as it's fast, action-packed and aesthetically pleasing. Cricket traditionalists aren't all that keen on it. Whether this form of cricket can stand the test of time is up in the air, but I will say, I wouldn't be surprised at all if it doesn't.

Learn more about this author, Aj Brady.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Is the new 'Twenty20' cricket version a curse or a boon?

  • 1 of 17

    by Aj Brady

    Twenty20 cricket is an interesting concept, however at the end of the day, it comes a distant third behind Test Match cricket

    read more

  • 2 of 17

    by Malcolm Toogood

    It is no surprise to see the old chestnuts being trotted-out as soon as any discussion begins on the merits, or otherwise,

    read more

  • 3 of 17

    by Phil Hill

    You just have to look at the spectator figures to appreciate how successful the Twenty20 cricket games have been since their

    read more

  • 4 of 17

    by Spartan Sense

    The future of cricket as a TRUE world sport lies in 20/20 cricket. At the moment there are 10 test playing nations and Zimbabwe's

    read more

  • 5 of 17

    by Kimberte William

    Twenty20 cricket is here to stay. There is no stopping this shorter, more electric and captivating form of the game. Cricket

    read more

View All Articles on:
Is the new 'Twenty20' cricket version a curse or a boon?

Add your voice

Know something about Is the new 'Twenty20' cricket version a curse or a boon??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

Helium Debate

Cast your vote!

The Car of Tomorrow is not worthy of Nascar status

Click for your side.

177971

Featured Partner

Nature's Voice Our Choice

Nature's Voice Our Choice's mission is to preserve, conserve, and restore water resources in communities throughout t...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA