Where Knowledge Rules

Home:

Politics, News & Issues

Get a Widget for this title

The case for the separation of church and state

Religion plays an important part in the lives of many people, for some it serves as simply a moral guide and for others it is a strict way of life. Over the centuries religion has played a fundamental role in ruling people's lives, in the Middle Ages the Catholic Church was one of the most powerful organizations on the face of the planet and in many countries today religious governments rule according to the laws of their faith, but is this morally right? Should we really allow religion to govern our lives?

In order to answer this question properly I feel that I must first explain my views on what a government is and what it's role is. As a socialist I believe that a government has a moral obligation to look after the people, it's fundamental role is to ensure that everyone has a fair chance to lead the life they want and deserve as human beings. Many people believe that socialism is all about control but this is not so, socialism and democracy are (at least to me) far more closely related than capitalism and democracy. I believe that everyone should be allowed to chose how they want to live their life, that personal freedom is paramount and that it is a government's job to ensure that society allows people to have that freedom. A government should always have the best interest of it's people at it's heart.

So what role does religion play in this? Faith in God can bring people great joy, great strength in times of need and great solace at times of loss, but can they bring a great amount of joy and prosperity to an entire nation at all times? Can religious teachings really dictate the laws of the land? To me the answer is simply no. A religion is an individual choice and anyone who believes in democracy believes that we should be allowed to make that choice. But to have a religious government would be to have a government creating laws based on religious teachings and that is not having the best interests of the people at heart, that is having religion at heart. If you truly respect people's freedoms then your religion should not affect your judgment when it comes to the lives of others. We cannot and must not live in a society where people use their religious views to rule if we are to say that we live in a democracy.

Over the years many great leaders have said that their faith played a huge role in their personal lives. To me this is perfectly natural, essentially that is what religion is all about : your personal life. However, one cannot really say that a religious person was following their faith when they decided to go to war and kill many people, or when they decided that the economy needed a boost as religions generally teach us not to kill or to seek wealth. Such decisions made by these people often go against their religion's basic teachings but they are necessary to keep their nation prosperous. Faith often gives such great leaders the strength to make these decisions and this is entirely different to using your religion to guide your decision making process. I have no problem whatsoever with religious people holding positions of power, this is what democracy is all about, but their religion must be kept to their private lives. To govern you must essentially give yourself up to the interests of the public, and your private life should play no part in your government.

In summary, I believe that it is entirely wrong to rule a country by the laws of a religion. Democracy does not allow for it and anyone who respects freedom should be able to understand this.

Learn more about this author, Angus Macdonald.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

The case for the separation of church and state

  • 1 of 79

    by Brian Burns

    Mend The Wall

    For many years now Evangelicals in America have been positioning themselves inside of Washington D.C., and

    read more

  • 2 of 79

    by Foxbaron

    Somebody tell me when did we ever not have a seperation of church and state? It has always been that way since the Constitution

    read more

  • 3 of 79

    by Liz Orton

    In school, you may have learned that the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights provided for freedom of religion, separation

    read more

  • 4 of 79

    by Elizabeth M. Young

    The utterances, exposees and events of the past nine years have served as the ultimate justification for a separation

    read more

  • 5 of 79

    by Adam Burke

    The Constitution of the United States of America is often considered the greatest political document of modern times. It

    read more

View All Articles on:
The case for the separation of church and state

Add your voice

Know something about The case for the separation of church and state?
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

122054

Featured Partner

Buckeye Institute

The Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Solutions is a nonpartisan research and educational institute devoted to indi...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA