13 of 20

No

Write now Print Email Article Invite a writer™ Add to Favorites Contact this writer

Are we on the same page? Were talking science but of what 'faith'? My article here is definitive of the corrupt influence men of the past have infected our 21st century understanding of 'real' scientific data with, by their political and religiously motivated 'dominance' of our reality in principle fact sharing, as well as infection of our truth by words like postulate that allow the unreal to be the foundation of what is 'professed' to be so!
IMAGE - FIELD OF STUDY = The core of the word ideology they call this "an organized collection of ideas" / now that my friend is the methodology of 'model format' for every experiment ever conceived! NOW RELIGIOUS IDEOLOGY Your misinforming my intelligence by omitting the word religious or calling it political, but I already took this into consideration by my previous post;

In the 18th century this word ideology was coined to mean a "science of ideas" being actually meant for politics, yet as it appears / at least in my view "Destutt de Tracy" was a failure in many respects and yet his "coinage" in moral social philosophy, lives on 'religiously' - in spite of that light in 'my' perspective ; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antoine_Destutt_de_Trac y
Ideology is the philosophical part of scientific 'idea' or [image] in perspective / creativity, the core of where indifference is realized to create our experimental models, for analyzing of whatsoever you may find warranting scrutiny / discerning fact therefrom!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideology
Ideology was coined as a methodology for the science - philosophy in politics generates - motivates by mans nature through his needs socially and there is never an image without a planed perspective for science to do its deeds, that are always based upon mans needs!

So with that - I would Say ; NO! Adding that I don't follow old words written, when they confound mans understanding of science 'fact' with the [untrue], making it appear to be so and thereafter maintaining 'that' all experimentation is relevant [only] if it proceeds in that direction!
From my 'humble' perspective!
I'll add this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idea
And close adding;
axiom seems to fit well (initial necessary consensus) - as many of sciences greatest common grounds are based in postulates! Philosophy of I would think so! By great scholars and political agents that aren't any more than beliefs yet taught as gospel by the creatures that follow latter! UNWHITTINGLY!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

• 1
• 2
• next page >>

more options

hide

Add your voice

Know something about Can we separate science from ideology??
We want to hear your view. Write now!