Channel Button

There are 12 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #3 by Helium's members.

Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

Government & Policies

Should the government fund needle exchange programs?

Results so far:

No
50% 59 votes Total: 119 votes
Yes
50% 60 votes

Government governs best which governs the least. The biggest role of government, especially at the federal level, is the defense of our country and its people. That is why I believe government should be funding needle exchange programs nationally. It is a question of national defense against the spread of contagious, infectious diseases.

Drug addicts who have difficulty getting needles will share and reuse other's needles. Therefore this population is becoming infected with very lethal and very expensive to treat diseases like HIV and Hepatitis C. When the addicts wind up in prison, as many do, we as taxpayers foot the bill to provide treatment for these diseases to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars per year per patient.

There also exists the public health risk to the general population, to include health care workers, emergency personnel, police and correctional officers, and the sexual partners of the infected addicts. In Washington D.C., not known for governmental efficiency or innovation, a needle exchange program has been in place for years. According to former Surgeon General David Satcher testifying before a Congressional committee recently, not only has there been a decrease in the reported cases of new HIV and Hepatitis C in D.C. but, to the surprise of those opposed to these programs, there has been no concomitant rise in the number of people using IV drugs. In the meantime, in parts of the country without exchange programs there has been an explosion in the incidence of Hepatitis C. Prisons throughout the country report as many as 30 to 50% of their inmates have Hepatitis C.

So, let's do the math: a couple of million bucks or so for a national needle exchange that will prevent serious public health problems and not increase I.V. drug use or spending many tens of millions trying to treat infected addicts and others. I say let's use common sense and good public health practices by funding needle exchange programs.

Learn more about this author, Jeff Vidrine.
Contact this writer Click here to send author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Should the government fund needle exchange programs?

Yes
  • 1 of 4

    by Jamie Korf

    People who inject drugs are at risk of contracting HIV, hepatitis and other blood-borne diseases if they share dirty ...read more

  • 2 of 4

    by Martin Chandler

    I feel compelled to write in support of government funding for needle exchange programs, especially in light of one o...read more

No
  • 1 of 8

    by Lucy Rucker

    Should the government fund needle exchange programs? No, that would not be a productive program at all, it would n...read more

  • 2 of 8

    by T. M. Beeker

    What is the best solution for most Americans? That should always be the question on the minds of those elected to rep...read more

Add your voice

Know something about Should the government fund needle exchange programs??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

98330

Featured Partner

Americans for Prosperity

Americans for Prosperity (AFP) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse AFP...more

What is Helium? | User Guide | Community | Link to Helium | Privacy | User Agreement | DMCA

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA