by Stanley W. Shura

Created on: July 13, 2007   Last Updated: February 22, 2012

It seems that most of the time, questions such as these are posed as "non-question questions" - that is, those the very asking of which reveals the asker's opinion, or at least implication, that the question is actually legit, and that a *particular* answer is thus implied.  In other words, it's putting up for debate (or the "democratic" process, a matter to which the public has NO claim or rightful protest.  Should a gay couple be allowed to hold hands in public?  Duh!  Who the hell is anyone to protest this? 

This is the same regard I hold for this question.  It's moot.  The answer is obvious, and I personally find it to be a burdensome task to explicate the hair-splitting, head-splitting  explanation of a basic human (or "God-given") right.. The question as it is stated is rather simple if taken literally - should an otherwise eligible citizen be barred from voting if s/he has been diagnosed with one of a variety of disorders listed in the the American Psychiatric Association's (APA's) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (the DSM IV).

All that said, the differentiation to which I refer is a matter of A.)defining "mentally ill", B.) deciding whether or not all contexts of the right to vote (local versus national, and candidate selection versus voting on specific referenda, for example) should have the same requirements regarding mental competency, and guardianship and other legal statuses of the citizen desiring to vote.

Let me address item "B" first, and swiftly. I am of the opinion that if you are capable of voting for your local school superintendent, you are likewise capable and eligible to vote for our next United States president. And, I am also of the opinion that if you are of sound enough mind to select a candidate, you are similarly disposed to have your voice count on various propositions and proposed legislation. I only include this in my argument because I can see where some citizens may feel that different contexts have different cognitive criteria. I happen to think not...

Now, to address the first point, item "A" - the definition of "mentally ill". I believe that the current scope of "mentally ill" indicates suffering from one or more disorders affecting mood, behavior, and/or cognitive function, which can range in severity from mild social anxiety or attentional deficits, to full blown (current/active/episodic?) schizophrenia and other psychotic

• 1
• 2
• Next Page >>