Home > Politics, News & Issues > International Politics > War & Peace
Results so far:
| Yes | 45% | 312 votes | Total: 698 votes | |
| No | 55% | 386 votes |
Created on: July 12, 2007
The US certainly has the moral obligation to charge George W. Bush with crimes against humanity for killing so many innocent people under obviously false pretense. Bush knew there were no wmd's in Iraq long prior to the invasion, but continues to propagate the lies to this very day. Meanwhile the situation in Iraq has worsened.
George Bush is far from innocent. Only an absolute fool would defend or support what is undeniably the most corrupt administration in the history of this formerly great nation. A nation does not become great by killing children in cold blood, nor can any country expect to retain any semblance integrity as long as the citizenry allow the government to commit unspeakable crimes abroad.
George Bush is a monster and he should be treated as such. He is responsible for the deaths of far more Iraqis than Saddam Hussein. Shouldn't he also swing? Don't kid yourselves any longer. It is neither noble or patriotic to make excuses for a warmonger.
Learn more about this author, B. Thomas Cooper.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Does the US have a moral obligation to stay in Iraq until peace is secured?
No
Yes
View all articles on: Does the US have a moral obligation to stay in Iraq until peace is secured?