There are 16 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #11 by Helium's members.
"Morality" is a very complicated word. It doesn't describe one simple, straightforward thing which can be "wed to" or "divorced from" government.
Indeed, there is one particular kind of ethical distinction that would clarify this issue quite a bit: The difference between "permissible" and "allowable." (Yes, I know they are synonyms; I am using a technical, philosophical usage.)
Permissible actions are those that it is all right for you to do. They aren't necessarily things you ought to do, let alone things you are morally obligated to do; merely things that you may do if you wish. Permissible actions would include wearing hats on Sundays and owning laptop computers.
Allowable actions, on the other hand, are a broader category. They include not only things that it is all right for you to do, but things that it is wrong for others to stop you from doing-if even you actually ought not do them. Examples could include being lazy at work, lying about a minor matter, making a rude comment. Usually, an impermissible action becomes allowable when the wrong done by stopping it outweighs the wrong done by allowing it to happen.
With this distinction in mind, it's easy to see what the role of government ought to be: to allow only allowable actions and prevent unallowable actions. Some moral wrongs, like murder and grand theft, are obviously unallowable; and so we create law enforcement systems to prevent them. Others, like lying and impoliteness, are allowable, and so it would be overly moralistic-even totalitarian-to enforce against them.
This changes the question dramatically, from a broad and difficult, "Should government legislate morality?" to a much simpler matter of "Is this particular wrong allowable?" If it is, let it slide; if not, ban it. Which is which ought to be something we can figure out with enough thought and dialogue.
Learn more about this author, Patrick Julius.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
To fully grasp the notions of morality and government, one need look only as far as a high school history book. Civil law,
by Art Vandelay
The government's involvement in morality is a very slippery slope that brings up strong feelings among those on either side
Morality tends to be a fairly arbitrary thing, and I find that most people have the same basic understanding of the term,
The sentiment that government and morality should be divorced is rather ludicrous, given that government as we have it here
The State is under the same moral laws as the individual, for the government is comprised of individuals. To suppose that
View All Articles on:
Why government and morality should be divorced
Add your voice
Know something about Why government and morality should be divorced?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Nature's Voice Our Choice's mission is to preserve, conserve, and restore water resources in communities throughout t...more
hide