There are 41 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #1 by Helium's members.
Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Yes | 30% | 130 votes | Total: 437 votes | |
| No | 70% | 307 votes |
The US government should NOT help fund election campaigns. It would only make the problem worse!
Without a doubt, current election campaigns favor those with money - the elite. There are plenty of intelligent, passionate, service-minded people who could serve their country in an elected position. However, if the money isn't there, it just won't happen.
Part of the problem is that campaign spending has gotten out of hand. Candidates spend an astronomical amount of money trying to outdo the competition and get the attention of the electorate. It hasn't always been this way, but a few things have contributed to the current state of things.
The electorate has become much more distracted over the years. So much competes for our attention now and we are inclined to give in to the distraction. We are not as interested or invested in campaigns and elections. Many of us have become disenfranchised, often feeling like our vote or our opinions don't make much of a difference anyway.
Additionally, the cost of advertising has gone up - way up. I spent the better part of ten years as a media planner at an advertising agency - buying time on television and radio, space in magazines, newspapers and internet for my clients. Many media offer discounted "political rates" for campaign season. These are the lowest rates the media outlet can offer but even these rates can be expensive. I saw rates go up just in the years I bought media. Advertising budgets that were once quite adequate just don't compete anymore.
Not only does it cost more to get ads on all the "best" TV networks and publications but it costs to get the best ads too. No more simple ads showing a nice picture of the candidate with some text giving us a summary of what he's all about. Ads have become much more sophisticated. The "sophisticated", media-savvy electorate will hardly look at a candidate who cannot provide ads that meet the high standards we've come to expect in our advertising.
So all of this means that the candidates with money are the only ones with real access to today's elections. Could the government change this? Sure. And campaign reform is trying to change some of this. However, the government should NOT help fund campaigns. The American people pay for enough already!
Our tax dollars should not be allocated for outrageously expensive advertising campaigns unless they intend to let us have some say in how the money is spent. Not likely, but it is our money they'd be using after all - call it government
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The US government should NOT help fund election campaigns. It would only make the problem worse!
Without a doubt, current
by Chad Morgan
The United States Government is one that is very unique. It is so unique that just about every new country ie. Iraq has tried
Elections are the bread and butter of our Constitutional Democratic Republic. In practice, elections are very expensive,
by Kate Johnson
Not only should the US government help fund election campaigns, the government should provide a fixed and finite medium for
Add your voice
Know something about Should the US government help fund election campaigns??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
Washington, D.C. Masons, members of the Free and Accepted Masons of Washington, D.C. Freemasonry is first and foremos...more
hide