Please log in
There are 8 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #1 by Helium's members.
Before I begin: A bias. I hate Mel Gibson. The one time I ever liked his work was his surprisingly good(because it was visceral) portrayal of Hamlet(in an otherwise badly truncated & maimed version). Beyond that, I think he's a self-obsessed, sexist, homophobic mindless macho goon who so OBVIOUSLY wants to be the next John Wayne. This makes me like him even less: y'see, I hated the FIRST John Wayne. This brainless ego trip deserved to sink like a stone, out of sight forever. Now it's Best Picture. Which only goes to show the Oscars are crap. But we knew that, didn't we?
I was amazed to look at other comments on this film at this site and find them all to be positive. I'd have thought this would have been a PRIME subject of attack. Filling in the gap, here's the NEGATIVE review of BRAVEHEART. I presume you've seen it by now, if you're reading this, so I'll only go into plot details as necessary.
I'll get this out of the way: Depite the frequency of the always-nauseating tin whistle-which is really more of an Irish thing, isn't it?-this is an entertaining film if you don't care at all about the subject whose story it claims to tell. Yes-the cinematography, acting, editing, fight scenes, decor, and other surface items people were well-paid to keep looking good so Gibson would appear he could actually direct-these are all excellent. The scripting, in a very shallow way, is witty-the dialogue, not the hackneyed plot grafted onto history. But I really don't give a damn. These are the last nice things about the movie you'll hear in this review. So what's so wrong with this picture?
First, and foremost: Being of descent from Scotland's Dunndeigh clan, I am heartily offended by the multiple historical inaccuracies shot throughout this thing(these people are paid enough to do research on more than costumes; there is no excuse for this all-too-common insulting carelessness in Hollywood films), and find it surprising that this thing is so popular as it is in Scotland. Merely a few(of many potential) examples:
It portrayed Robert Bruce, their national hero and liberator of Scotland(and, indirectly, destroyer of Edward II) as a coward, traitor, liar and quisling, which hasn't any basis in historical fact. (It's like claiming Lincoln intended to, well, enslave the slaves.) I know a time when Scots would kill you for suggestions like that.
The then-future queen of England(well, the secondary one), the wife of Edward II, Isabel, could not have had a child by William Wallace. In
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by JLRoberson
Before I begin: A bias. I hate Mel Gibson. The one time I ever liked his work was his surprisingly good(because it was visceral)
There is an interesting genre of music that is rarely spoken of, but should be: It's Historical Fiction. Basically, someone
by Ian Black
Based on historical events surrounding Scotland and England, Mel Gibson rises as the ancient lenegend, William Wallace.
Scotland
As a boy William Wallace (Gibson) the son of a Scottish farmer loses his father to the constant wars with the English troops
by Movie Pulse
A cinematic masterpiece of epic proportions, Mel Gibson's Braveheart easily competes with the classic historical epics of
View All Articles on:
Movie reviews: Braveheart
Add your voice
Know something about Movie reviews: Braveheart?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
My hope is that every person with cancer can smile because someone touched his or her life. So many of you made Nick...more
hide