Absolutely not- the United States is dead wrong in its decision to stay out of the Kyoto Treaty. The Kyoto Treaty is an important collaboration between the most powerful nations in the world to try and cut down on emissions and preserve the environment. What message does it send when the most powerful country, which also happens to contribute the most pollution, backs out?
The United States, as a country, contributes more pollution than any of the other countries asked to participate. This means the US has a responsibility to take the lead, to give a good example, and bear responsibility for its actions. How can the Kyoto Treaty hope to fulfil its purpose when the nation that damages the environment most does not join? How can the treaty hope to protect the environment and lower worldwide emissions when the US steadfastly refuses to do anything to lower its damaging environmental impact?
A common excuse that the United States uses for not joining is claiming that since China didn't join, the US shouldn't have to. This argument is childish and petty. It doesn't matter what China does or doesn't do, the US should be independent and set a good example anyway. China is not the main source of emissions for the world. Yes; it is growing rapidly, and could in the near future become the biggest polluter. But it isn't now, and we should not base our actions on those of another country. The fact that China did not join is not a viable reason for the United States to stay out of it.
Another excuse is that it would be far too costly to American Business to enact all the emissions standards and changes required by the treaty, which is not only preposterous, it is inconsequential. Emissions standards would save money for everyone in the long run, which would boost the US economy since more people would have more money to spend on things other than gas. Besides which, isn't the environment more important than a few lost dollars per car? The cost, if any, would be insignificant compared to how great the impact would be on the world and on the health and independence of the nation.
Finally, I am most disappoined in the United State's choice because the United States is supposed to be a role model and leader for the world. If the United States does not join or support something, whether it be a group or a treaty, that something will most likely not be very successful. We are The World Power, and with that title comes great responsibility. We have a responsibility to take the lead in environmental protection, to give other countries a model and behavior to look up to and emulate. If we don't join the Kyoto Treaty, what makes us think any other country would want to? Where is the muscle backing it up?
If we joined, the treaty would have much more clout in the international community, and would have a much greater positive effect on the world and environment.