Channel Button

There are 7 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #2 by Helium's members.

Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

Conservation

Get a Widget for this title

In calculating endangered fish species, should hatchery populations be counted or just wild fish?

Results so far:

Wild
67% 41 votes Total: 61 votes
Hatcheries
33% 20 votes

It is standard practice when conducting a census of any given species that the 'captive' and wild populations are tallied separately. This is done because there is seldom any guarantee that the 'captive' population can sustain itself once released into the wild.

Two useful examples to illustrate this point are the scimitar-horned oryx of northern Africa and the Waldrapp Ibis of Africa, Europe and Asia Minor. The Scimitar-horned oryx is considered extinct, as no population is known to exist in the wild, despite healthy populations existing in zoos worldwide. A reintroduction program is underway but until the reintroduced population proves itself to be self sustaining in the wild this species will continue to be classified as extinct.

To the point of reintroduction: The Waldrapp ibis, a species once common across north Africa, Asia minor and into Europe, now only exists naturally in two known locations in north Africa and in a semi-wild state in Austria. The remainder of the population can be found in zoos around the world.

It has been noted in this and other species of bird that much of the behaviour recorded in the wild population is absent or diminished in the captive population. In order for the captive population to survive and thrive in the wild following reintroduction they do need to relearn those vital behaviours. It has been established that this does not happen automatically on reentering the wild and that the birds earmarked for reintroduction have to be encouraged through various enrichment activities to relearn the behaviours they have lost.

The reason I share these two examples is to justify why when conducting a census of endangered fish populations only the wild fish should be counted. No matter how well the hatcheries are doing (and they are critical to the longterm survival of many species) the net gain/loss from their reintroduced populations cannot be relied upon until they have proven themselves capable of survival in the wild.

Learn more about this author, Robert Wiggins.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

In calculating endangered fish species, should hatchery populations be counted or just wild fish?

Wild
  • 1 of 6

    by Ann Dennis

    The key word here is endangered and animals of any species that are kept in an artificial environment are not endangered

    read more

  • 2 of 6

    by Robert Wiggins

    It is standard practice when conducting a census of any given species that the 'captive' and wild populations are tallied

    read more

Hatcheries
  • 1 of 1

    by Eileen Hughes

    I believe that hatcheries are doing a great job and we need more of them. They are producing thousands of fish that would

    read more

Add your voice

Know something about In calculating endangered fish species, should hatchery populations be counted or just wild fish? ?
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

136398

Featured Partner

Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting

The Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting is an innovator in international nonprofit journalism. It goes beyond the hea...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA