Channel Button

There are 119 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #3 by Helium's members.

Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

News Industry

Get a Widget for this title

Should the government control talk radio to make it more "balanced"?

Results so far:

Yes
10% 92 votes Total: 963 votes
No
90% 871 votes

If the government is going to mandate "balance" there's one major question to ask - who decides what "balanced" means?

For instance, on radio, the most popular hosts are unabashadly conservative, lead by broadcaster-in-chief Rush Limbaugh. These people SAY that they're conservative, and they're proud of it.

But what about television? Most Americans know (check the polls, too) that ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN and MSNBC are liberal. But which one of them SAYS that they're liberal? They don't say it. Heck, even Fox leans slightly to the left, but because it's not as far left as the others, it's attacked as being a conservative mouthpiece.

So what are lawmakers to do? They obviously could identify who's calling themselves "conservative" and try to put self-described "liberals" on the air to counter their view points (an inane idea insofar as it assumes there's only liberal and conservative and completely discounts anything in between or on either side).

But, what if tomorrow, Rush Limbaugh started saying that "I am bipartisan. Completely objective."? How do you regulate that?

That's exactly what the television stations do. They are clearly liberal, yet they claim objectivity. Don't believe me? Look at the numbers released by MSNBC the other day - some ninety percent of journalists who give to political candidates give to democrats rather than republicans. That's the same number that matches Washington Bureau voting numbers in election after election. In the 2000 elections, a higher percentage of political reporters voted for Al Gore than did members of the Democratic party. That means reporters are to the left even of the average Democrat.

So let's recap.

TV = you get a liberal point of view from people who claim to be impartial.

Radio = you get a conservative point of view from people who admit they're conservative.

Seems to me, all that government control would do in this case would be to punish conservatives for being honest, while rewarding liberals for covering their agenda.

I'm encouraged that, as of this writing, there are eight entries on the "No" side, and not a single one on the "Yes" side.

We know communism when we see it. Let freedom ring.

Learn more about this author, J.R. Anthony.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Should the government control talk radio to make it more "balanced"?

No
  • 1 of 110

    by Sean Wardak

    It's not the government's job to control talk radio or any other format for free speech. The Lib's may not like talk radio

    read more

  • 2 of 110

    by Michael Collins

    The question is: should the government control talk radio to make it more balanced?

    The answer is: unequivocally, no.

    The key

    read more

Yes
  • 1 of 9

    by Tess Ramano

    As much as this goes against all the rights enveloped with the first Amendment and free speech, radio could use a little

    read more

  • 2 of 9

    by Scott Cockrell

    here we have an area,that has proof(if you know where to look),of the level of bias our media holds.this issue was in committee,at

    read more

Add your voice

Know something about Should the government control talk radio to make it more "balanced"? ?
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

173917

Featured Partner

Takes All Types

Takes All Types has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Takes All Types' f...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA