Results so far:
| Yes | 53% | 325 votes | Total: 614 votes | |
| No | 47% | 289 votes |
Baseball in so many ways has stripped itself of being distinguishable from other professional sports.
Inter-league play has minimized the effect of two teams meeting for the first time that season in the World Series. Day games no longer exist in the World Series or playoffs. The game is no longer a gentleman's sport with all the steroids allegations.
Granted, baseball has done some crazy things recently, such as creating the rule that the league that wins the All-Star Game "earns" the right to home-field advantage in the World Series.
That rule should be banished just like Barry Bonds' name from the record books, but that is an argument for another time.
The designated-hitter rule is one of the last aspects of baseball that sets itself apart from its counterparts (the NBA, NFL and NHL).
It's the equivalent of the Western Conference in the NBA enforcing a rule that no player should be taller than 6 feet, 9 inches, while the Eastern Conference can play anyone. Or how about this: It's like the NFL allowing only one division to employ the fumblerooskie play.
The DH rule came into effect in the American League in 1973 because ticket sales were dwindling. The entertainment value is very expensive these days. A family of four can expect to spend more than $100 to attend a game.
Fans deserve to watch the best players perform at any position or circumstance because of the money they are paying. Would you rather watch David Ortiz bat as the DH for the Red Sox, or have Curt Schilling take some hacks at the ball?
Baseball purists argue that the DH rule has damaged the sanctity of the game. They say, "Look at Babe Ruth. He pitched. He certainly hit." However, for every Babe Ruth, thousands of Randy Johnsons exists. Does it not make you cringe when Johnson with his lanky body - or any other pitcher for that matter - swings the bat?
Since the DH rule came into play, the American League holds only a slight edge in World Series championships, winning 19 compared to the National League's 14. So the rule is not negatively affecting the chance for the National League to compete with the American League.
Amid all the negative headlines involving Bonds, Mark McGwire, Sammy Sosa, Rafael Palmeiro and Jason Giambi, baseball must hang on to all that is working in its favor.
The DH rule sets itself apart from the rest. Taking it away will move baseball one step closer to obscurity.
Learn more about this author, Javier Morales.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Jim Darrien
How many pitchers do you want to see with a bat in their hands? Personally I can think of three. Carlos Zambrano and Jason
by Gary Cain
To bat, or not to bat, that is the question.
According to Major League Baseball's current rulebook, all interleague games
by John Osbron
The Designated Hitter rule is a ridiculous rule that never should have been implemented in the first place. If everyone
by Ryan Gray
Think about the major professional sports leagues in this country. How many of them have a setup where half of the league
Add your voice
Know something about Should baseball get rid of the designated hitter rule??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
ResearchSEA - Asia Research News
ResearchSEA - Asia Research News is Asia's first research news portal. It is a one-stop center where journalists a...more
hide