he did cost Gore the election and see where that might lead us under a system of more candidates and more parties.
Candidate N gets on the ballots in the Solid South. Candidate B gets on the ballots in the more liberal, northeastern states. Candidate R gets on the ballots in Texas, California, Oregon, Washington, Utah and New Mexico. Candidate L gets on the ballots of the rust-belt states such as Ohio, Pennsylvania and Illinois. And, then, we have our two, main party candidates.
When candidates N, B, R and L tally their electoral votes following the election, they each draw at least one or two of the largest electoral states out of the mix, with none of them getting enough to win. But, they draw away so many electoral votes that the major party candidates cannot get anywhere near a majority. The same goes for the popular votes. (This could even happen with a single, strong, independent candidate, but the multi-candidate scenario makes for more interesting possibilities.)
So, we move to the House of Representative where each state gets one vote to use among the three top Presidential candidates from the electoral process. The Senate uses the same process for the Vice President, but votes only for the two, top vote-getters from the electoral college. The confusion here would even move to the state level where all of a state's representatives vote for which candidate their single state vote will support. We would have mini-wars in the midst of the big war!
With our Congress split so evenly, we could see a 26-26 tie for the presidential race and the same for the vice presidential race. Stay with me because I am setting up a scenario that would revive the interests of many more millions of Americans in the election process!
Should this happen, Nancy Pelosi, or whoever is Speaker of the House at that time, would sit in as President of the United States until a majority could be reached.
This scenario goes on and on. We could have one scenario in which a winning Vice President would select from among the three, highest electoral-college Presidential candidates. Wouldn't that find its way to the Supreme Court?! It would be the most fun election in my long life-time and, I dare say, in the history of our Republic. We would need more lawyers than we already have in this country-and that is plenty!
The election would dominate the news for months, maybe even pushing Paris Hilton to the second page. People would be glued to their TVs and computers to follow the daily progress in their own state and in the nation. Potential voters would begin to think they really could make a difference, maybe some even becoming activists.
So, the way to get people to vote is to get more people to run and get more viable parties involved. As long as we stay with the same old stale bread, we are never going to enjoy our sandwich!
Learn more about this author, Doctor Bob.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Doctor Bob
Here we have a definitive model of the cause and effect controversy. Voter apathy has absolutely nothing to do with diminishing
by Kevin Tetter
Thomas Jefferson once said, "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance". He understood that no system, including the American
by DjWhite
Is political apathy a natural state or is it a learned reaction? Can the powers-that-be blame the common people for being
Twenty seven years ago,after my citizenship ceremony I registered as voter.In all elections,local,sta te and national I participated
by Daniel Sisk
Voter apathy and its impact on democracy and many other things we old dear has cast a dark shadow. We see this as Christmas
View All Articles on:
Voter apathy and its effect on democracy in the U.S.
Add your voice
Know something about Voter apathy and its effect on democracy in the U.S.?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA)
The National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause....more
hide