Home > Personal Finance > Retirement
Results so far:
| Yes | 18% | 228 votes | Total: 1258 votes | |
| No | 82% | 1030 votes |
Created on: June 22, 2007
No. If nothing else, it's about survivors.
The overwhelming majority of people collecting Social Security benefits today include two main groups;
1. Retired workers who have paid into the Social Security System their entire working lives.
2. Survivors; widows, widowers, and children of deceased breadwinners.
Virtually every discussion on Social Security focuses exclusively on the first group noted above. And, while I am absolutely certain that such folks earned and deserve their benefits, I know from personal experience about the second group.
My father died when I was ten years old. My mother faced the prospect of supporting myself and my two older brothers. Without the Social Security survivors' checks my mom received, we never would have made it. Those checks, while not nearly enough to live on, provided supplemental support for each of us until we each reached age 18.
Unless you have lived through such an experience it is difficult to imagine. Dads or Moms aren't supposed to die while their kids are young. But they do.
If you died young and your spouse was left with children to raise, wouldn't you want your spouse to receive some help from Social Security?
Learn more about this author, Bruce Pilgrim.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Should Social Security benefits be abolished?
No
Yes
View all articles on: Should Social Security benefits be abolished?
Featured Partner
Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment (FREE)
FREE advances conservation and environmental values by applying modern science and America's founding ideals to policy debates. FREE is comprised of intellectual entrepreneurs explaining how economic incentives, secure property rights, t...more