Where Knowledge Rules

US Politics:

US Elections

Debate_icon Get a Widget for this title

Should the Electoral College be abolished?

Results so far:

Yes
60% 293 votes Total: 487 votes
No
40% 194 votes

The Electoral College should be abolished because it doesn't always reflect the popular vote especially in close elections. The 2000 presidential election was one such occasion. In the election Al Gore won the popular vote by a slim margin of 50,996,582 to 50,456,062. However, George W. Bush became president because he received 271 electoral votes while Gore only received 266. The 2000 election wasn't an isolated incident either. There have been a few other instances in American history where this has happened, notably 1876 and 1888. (Microsoft Encarta 2004, Electoral College)

In the Electoral College process electors are elected by voters from the 50 states. It's this group of electors who nominally elect the president The number of electoral votes each state can cast is determined by the number of senators and representatives a state has. The Electoral College uses a "winner takes all" system. This system has been challenged but was upheld in a 1969 Supreme Court decision. (Microsoft Encarta 2004, Electoral College)The winner of the majority of a state's popular vote receives all of that state's electoral votes. In this way the popular vote isn't represented.

A candidate can win the majority by as little as one vote and still receive all the electoral votes. The smaller the winning margin is the larger the minority will be. If the presidential candidate wins the election solely on the electoral vote like in 2000 then essentially the minority's vote isn't represented.

A way to avoid this is to have a direct popular vote and get rid of the Electoral College. Alternatively it might be more acceptable to only modify the Electoral College. The "winner takes all" system could be replaced with a proportional one. If a candidate wins a majority of the popular vote in a state with 5 electoral votes and carries only 2 of the 3 congressional districts then he or she should receive 4 electoral votes, which equals the 2 districts and the winner of the majority of the districts also gets the 2 votes for the senators.

Learn more about this author, Erik Markusson.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Should the Electoral College be abolished?

Yes
  • 1 of 32

    by Ray Peters

    The Electoral College was created by the framers of the US Constitution to provide for the election to the office of President

    read more

  • 2 of 32

    by Gary Sacco

    Eject the electors. Supplant the super delegates, too. The founding fathers masterfully crafted the Constitution. This document,

    read more

No
  • 1 of 23

    by A.J. Harmon

    Revision of the System

    In a representative democracy, the people should define the government; the government should not

    read more

  • 2 of 23

    by Bill Stone

    Many people point to the election of 2004 and call it a failure of the Electoral College system. "The people spoke! They

    read more

Add your voice

Know something about Should the Electoral College be abolished??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

122054

Featured Partner

Buckeye Institute

The Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Solutions is a nonpartisan research and educational institute devoted to indi...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA