There are 16 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #6 by Helium's members.
Results so far:
| Disagree | 34% | 78 votes | Total: 230 votes | |
| Agree | 66% | 152 votes |
One thing I can't stand is the fact how much auto insurance costs! I just moved from one state to another and the price for insurance has gone up! now the state I live in is considered a 'no fault' state.
I agree, insurance should be required for the driver not the vehicle. Why? Well for starters, the state I live in, people can't drive! That includes the cops! Getting cut off (and sometimes I speed a bit but not that much) on the roads NOT the highways/freeways mind you...
People on their cell phones not paying attention and cause an accident, these are all things I see each and everyday. It pisses me off.
Now cops, they do the same thing. They don't care. Personally cops should get tickets for some of the illegal driving they do WHEN there is NO emergency..but that is besides the point.
Insurance is a lot and it is hard to afford good insurance. Frankly, I am sick of it all... It isn't the fault of the car, it is the fault of the driver and therefore, the driver should be insured and that should go under Health Insurance... the car shouldn't insured, that is just silly and costly! I would rather use my monthly auto insurance fees for something more exciting.
Learn more about this author, HazelEyes.
Click here to send author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Add your voice
Know something about Insurance should be required for the driver not the vehicle?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
Food for Everyone Foundation has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Food ...more
hide