There are 40 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #14 by Helium's members.
Results so far:
| Yes | 52% | 185 votes | Total: 359 votes | |
| No | 48% | 174 votes |
The U.S. government needs to close the Guantnamo Bay Detention Camp because of the damage its existence has caused to foreign policy, which outweighs any benefits. The world is well aware of the fact that the U.S. is dead serious about the "war on terror". Granted, the camp may prolong related public argument, riding on the waves of media coverage, but 250 detainees does not adequately represent the combined total number of enemy combatants who have been captured in Afghanistan and Iraq since 2001. In many respects, the camp is obsolete. And with the November 2008 orchestrated attacks in Mumbai, the world witnessed a new terrible reminder of the serious problem of Islamic terrorism.
The Obama administration has made it clear that it plans to shut down Guantnamo Bay Detention Camp. Now the big question is how will this be accomplished.[1] Since telling all of the prisoners they are "free to go", handing back their clothes and providing each with a couple hundred US dollars in spending money is not how a international controversy is solved. The processes of litigation and incarceration associated with the detention camp have been covered by a gray shroud, and like a decayed legal corpse, the controversy is awaiting burial.
The story of detainee Salim Hamdan allows a glimpse into the anatomy of the questionable due course of law - as it relates to the treatment of prisoners of war outside of constitutional law. Hamdan is a Yemeni who was nabbed in Afghanistan during the invasion, and admitted to being one of Osama bin Laden's personal bodyguards and drivers.[2]
Jump to 2007, Hamdan testified that previously, while he was imprisoned in Afghanistan, he received death threats, was physically assaulted, tortured in painful positions and exposed to extreme cold. He also described how he was held in extensive isolation while in Guantnamo Bay, to the point that he strongly considered "pleading guilty in order to get out of" solitary confinement.[3] Those kinds of treatment should have evoked the Third Geneva Convention which holds governments to the agreement that prisoners of war "shall in all circumstances be treated humanely." Hamdan's charges were dropped, along with charges held against Toronto-born detainee Omar Khadr, who had taken up arms against American forces in Afghanistan.[5] This member of the conspicuous Khadr family[6], living in Canada, was accused of throwing a hand grenade that killed a U.S. soldier. But Canadian lobbying seems to have gained Omar
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Much like virtually every other Bush administration creation, Guantanamo Bay is an American embarassment, a symbol of...read more
by Les Jacobs
Yes, because Guantanamo Bay is almost certainly holding innocent civilians behind bars. We know this because some, po...read more
by Ian Essling
Guantanamo Bay is vital for the survival of our country. Each captured terrorist imprisoned there is one less threat...read more
by Lamont Webb
I vote neither yes or no, on the subject of closing down Getmo. However, I would like to present one problem that I s...read more
Add your voice
Know something about Should the US close the military prison on Guantanamo Bay? ?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Already a member? Log in.
Featured Partner
Lifetime Literacy Foundation (LLF) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse...more
hide