There are 43 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #27 by Helium's members.
Results so far:
| Yes | 37% | 277 votes | Total: 744 votes | |
| No | 63% | 467 votes |
I write on the "yes" side of the debate with the understanding that anything is only as good as its organization and leadership. Simple separating boys and girls into separate facilities and programs is not enough without applying teaching strategies that reach them.
What needs to happen is the development of teaching strategies that make use of brain-based research that pinpoints how boys' and girls' brains react differently using the same stimulation. For instance, a study published in Nature Neuroscience in April 2000, demonstrated that women and men use totally different parts of their brains as they process and deliver navigation coordinates. Women tend to use concrete visuals, such as landmarks, and men use more abstracts concepts like "north" and "south."
Studies published in "Developmental Neuropsychology" and "Developmental Psychobiology" confirmed what conventional wisdom has dictated since the beginning of time: boys and girls develop language, spatial and social skills at different rates.
Socially speaking, it appears to make sense that boys and girls from middle school through high school may be better separated in an effort to overcome their hormones. But the separation, some say, also may alleviate a tendency toward what is called "gender intensification" in which boys sometimes identify certain activities such as poetry as "girly," and girls believe that wood shop is for boys. The National Association for Single Sex Public Education also reports that single-sex schools, when developed thoughtfully, can lead to improved grades and test scores.
Equally important in this debate is the gender of the teacher. Because males and females think and are socialized differently, this can affect the effectiveness of the education. One study found that boys in American elementary schools suffer because their teachers are primarily female. We see this when teachers urge mothers to place boys on Ritalin to artificially control their wayward minds and off the wall behavior. In Germany, however, where the majority of elementary teachers are male, it's the females who get the short end of the stick.
On the other hand, there is one very important aspect in this debate: We do not work in single-sex workplaces. Our work stations and tasks aren't divided by gender.
Learn more about this author, Rebecca Bibbs.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Hasan Goreja
I had always been a student of single-sex schools. In my primary education, middle, high school, intermediateand even now
Do children learn better in single-sex schools? Absolutely. Besides the fact that research supports this idea, as a teacher
by Marie Gerber
Do children learn better in single-sex schools? If we're talking about facts and figures, I will admit, I can't give you
by Lisa Kooper
I do not believe that the gender of students has any bearing on the learning process. Students will learn at their own pace
Add your voice
Know something about Do children learn better in single-sex schools??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
ResearchSEA - Asia Research News
ResearchSEA - Asia Research News is Asia's first research news portal. It is a one-stop center where journalists a...more
hide