There are 16 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #1 by Helium's members.
make our own choices as individuals. Our freedom of speech and expression are closely monitored and policed by terrorist obsessed, paranoid authorities. We are led, like a flock of sheep, to the confines of conformity and political correctness.
Personally, I am in full favour of a ban on fox hunting and would support even tighter restrictions on this issue. I fail to see how such a bloody, violent act of brutality could be deemed as a sport and would like to see more effective enforcement of the law in this case.
Similarly I have no opposition to the introduction of ID cards. While I wholly understand the arguments against and accept it is symbolic of a very real infringement on civil liberties, I actually agree with the government. A universal, compulsory form of identification could be an extremely positive apparatus for crime prevention and resolution. Furthermore, I am of the belief that if you have nothing to hide, there should be no problem with such a declaration.
On the subject of a national smoking ban, however, I am in slight disagreement with the men at Downing Street. As a non-smoker and entirely aware of the implications of both smoking and passive smoking, I commend the tough, no-nonsense approach of prohibition from 2007 onwards. It does strike me though, that an embargo is the removal of the fundamental human right. Fair enough, passive smoking affects the civil liberties of the non-smoker, with potentially grave consequences.
But I think we should all have the choice to smoke or not, whether to remain in a tobacco engulfed environment or go elsewhere and the option not to be labelled. A ban epitomises the instant eradication of these choices and our civil emancipation in an increasingly politically correct atmosphere.
Learn more about this author, Rob Cockerill.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Stubbing Out Our Civil Liberties
The announcement of a national smoking ban in public places by summer 2007 was the latest
by Jerry Curtis
Governments do not ban smoking altogether, because to do so would cut off a lucrative source of income. Nevertheless, in
by Cody Hodge
This is an interesting question, because I was actually having this discussion with a co-worker the other day. Governments
There are a myriad of reasons why governments shouldn't ban smoking outright, most notably the government has no moral or
Many atrocities occur in the world today. To combat these wrong doings, we have something called the justice system. If
View All Articles on:
Why don't governments ban smoking altogether?
Add your voice
Know something about Why don't governments ban smoking altogether??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
Breakthrough has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Breakthrough's featur...more
hide