Home > Politics, News & Issues > International Politics > War & Terrorism
Created on: May 13, 2007
By the end of this essay I will demonstrate why there is no relevance or value in not only conventional maritime forces but military forces period, when responding to a terrorist threat. I will do this by showing different possible scenarios of likely terrorist targets and how we as a "conventional military" become less than adequate.
Does anyone in the free world honestly think that a terrorist plot would include at home military establishments? What purpose would this serve to the terrorists themselves? There is no terror actually occurred by the general public. As a member of the military I expect to be in the line of danger, I did since the day I signed on the dotted line. If anyone thought other wise it would be like becoming a firefighter and thinking you would never have to go into a burning building.
Is it sad if a member of our military family dies in action? Of course it is horrible, but the day "said" member jotted their name on the line they knew what could happen. If a terrorist decided to hit one of our homeland bases what would he gain? A couple weeks in the news would be about it. As members of the military we have come to expect we are targets. Being the most likely target makes us probably the least likely. The terrorist gets no "terror" value from such an attack.
The extra people on gates, the extra training because of the "what if" factor, to me are not worth the money spent.
Now if an attack took place, where do you think it might take place to garner the most terror possible? What do "we" as citizens cherish most in our lives? In my opinion, these would include; our families and children, our money, our recreation, our entertainment and our needed things like water, and food.
Take Victoria, British Columbia for instance, if as a terrorist you wanted to kill a city, take out a cruise ship while it is docked in the city's harbor. Not only would that cause plenty of chaos but it would literally shut down the biggest industry on the island. The downward spiral of lost jobs, revenue and life would be catastrophic as opposed to a terrorist hitting the navy base.
There are many ways for terrorists to hit us and unless our government is ready to keep armed posts at all our reservoirs, nuclear facilities, shopping malls, arenas, theaters and countless other places people gather in large groups the military will be left for only clean up I am afraid to say.
Everyday in "hot" countries like Afghanistan and Iraq "extremists" are willing to take their own
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Key steps to stopping terrorism
by Shinobi
Terrorism is here to stay. If Afghanistan and Iraq proves anything - the act of terrorism cannot be stopped. Anybody can
by Uzitotinbaby
Stopping terrorism. Impossible to enact until we define just what constitutes a terrorist. Now I know according to the official
If there were a way of stopping terrorism permanently, we would have done it by now. UBL is only a figurehead. Even long
Acting like the "Lone Ranger" and making the world a gulag of police states is the only way to stop terrorism completely.
by Joe Sunstrum
By the end of this essay I will demonstrate why there is no relevance or value in not only conventional maritime forces
View All Articles on: Key steps to stopping terrorism
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
War in Iraq: Has the proposed withdrawal of allied troops from Iraq come too late?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment (FREE)
FREE advances conservation and environmental values by applying modern science and America's founding ideals to policy debates. FREE is comprised of intellectual entrepreneurs explaining how economic incentives, secure property rights, t...more