There are 10 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #1 by Helium's members.
An interesting topic came up during a conversation with a friend. We spoke about the political climate here in Singapore and the conversation touches on the freedom of speech and expression here in Singapore. Well, the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore actually guarantee this right of its citizens and that we can indeed invoke this right. But really, do people really invokes it? What I'm doing now - by writing this - I'm invoking that right. Hopefully, I don't get sued or asked to go for an interview........ Anyway, when invoking this right, we just have to be responsible in what we are saying. In other words, speak objectively. Then we are fine..... Yeah, maybe..........
Looking at the Sedition Act (Chapter 290), it is a chargeable offence to excite disaffection against the Government and the administration of justice in Singapore. Looking at it in perspective, the Constitution paradoxically allows for free speech/expression when the Sedition Act prevents it when it is directed towards the Government. Strange........... Same theory applies in the freedom of assembly clause guaranteed in the Constitution and the enforcement of the unlawful assembly law when you really do exercise that right of assembly. So, what is what? Allowed to speak freely against the Govt? Allowed to assemble peacefully? All this legal mambo jumbo is really confusing. I realised something though. As long as it is not political, your rights as stipulated in the Constitution can be exercised without fear of reprisals.
For example, a company having a family day at the park or beach with hundreds or even thousands of participants, dressed all with the same t-shirt or cap, assembles to participate in the event. This will not constitute unlawful assembly because if it is, the police stations and the courts will have a field day just dealing with this. But, if 10 person will to assemble in front of say Temasek Holdings to voice their disagreement on the billions lost in botched business deals like Shincorp, Optus, Chartered Semi-conductors, Micropolis, etc, they will be arrested? Maybe..... Maybe not...... well, we'll have to try and see then.
The crux of the question is: Are we afraid of persecution for our beliefs in our rights and the exercise of our rights? Probably. If we are not, we will be demanding for Mdm Ho Ching to be removed immediately and remedial actions to be taken to safeguard the people's money against blatant wastage. In business, there's always a risk
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Jason Lim
An interesting topic came up during a conversation with a friend. We spoke about the political climate here in Singap... read more
by Cairns Faber
Firstly, I am amazed to see how strongly the writers here correlate degree of democracy and measurement of first-worl... read more
Fast moving Singapore is facing a problem from the fast world system. The Sunday Times in early 2007 published a repo... read more
by Leo Poh Lee
Should there be a question mark after the title? Or is the title supposed to be a statement? What is a First Wo... read more
by Tas C
It is well known globally that Singapore is ruled by a dictatorship-like regime, under the mock pretence of democrac... read more
View All Articles on:
Singapore: A First World country
Add your voice
Know something about Singapore: A First World country?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side. Must be logged in.
Featured Partner
Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment (FREE)
The Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment (FREE) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance ...more
hide