Home > Politics, News & Issues > International Politics > War & Peace
Created on: May 01, 2007 Last Updated: November 17, 2008
It was a popular Democratic political tactic of protest to claim that U.S. strategies in Iraq were failing. Actually the 2003 war was a brilliant success and the nation rebuilding was a failure that needed a 'no nation left behind' remedial recovery. It wasn't until the troop surge worked after years of hard police work and reconstruction that Iraq moved more toward a working nation. A couple of days ago Iraq said that its congress will probably pass a three year extension for U.S. forces in Iraq in order to keep the peace.
President Bush was sort of a 'no child left behind' sort of guy himself-he preferred an education policy friendly to his own disposition as a smokescreen perhaps. A better domestic education policy was to let the top 25% of students get the best possible education so they could provide new enterprises and jobs in the future competing as a minority with the entire world and let the 25% that are slow or disinterested learners fall ion to recycle chutes to learn literacy and numeracy sufficient to pass a high school exit exam. I took a G.E.D. myself before getting a Bachelors degree and corrected high school exit exams from several states for a contract testing company for a while...the tests are fundamentally similar. Most Americans will never do meaningful abstract reasoning work anyway and it's a sham to dump a lot of non-material production jobs their way or create service jobs in financial sector areas that produce bad debt. Iraq needs a more intelligent policy using a lot of solar power and water desalination concepts.
The troop surge effective reduced terrorist violence in Iraq and a fragile peace has continued in to 2008 and the November election. Reconstruction of a nation torn apart by secular sectarian strife and global terrorism isn't easy. Iraq is considered a prime domino by terrorists in the effort to establish a Muslim Caliphate over the entire Middle East.
Democrats sometimes mistake Iraq for Vietnam...they love to protest war but have started them often enough in the past. The Vietnam War was a Kennedy-Johnson construction that Nixon brought to a halt, and the Iraq reconstruction is essentially successful now that could be unraveled and ruined by a Democrat administration if it isn't careful. The desire to create some sort of failure and retroactively fault Republicans shouldn't be a goal for Democrats of the new Obama administration.
Americans still consider, rather drunkenly perhaps, the Iraq nation rebuilding to be a war and
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Why US strategies in Iraq are failing
It was a popular Democratic political tactic of protest to claim that U.S. strategies in Iraq were failing. Actually the
The only viable resolution to the civil war in Iraq is a surge in diplomacy to negotiate a partition of Iraq into autonomous
Bye Bye Miss American Pie...
Those of you who know me have never seen me write of anything political, but at this point,
by Nathan H
U.S. strategies in Iraq are failing for a multitude of reasons:
(1) Not enough troops were committed to secure Baghdad. Furthermore,
Why can't this topic be a debate?
Our strategies are NOT failing. Just because there's nothing else on CNN than body counts
View All Articles on: Why US strategies in Iraq are failing
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Is the US to blame for civilian deaths in Afghanistan air strikes?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
The mission of Life for Mothers is to reduce maternal and infant mortality rates in developing countries, particularly those in Sub-Saharan Africa, by strengthening healthcare systems and developing, implementing, managing and funding in...more