2 of 8

Write now Article Tools

Page 2 of 5

Gangs and bullies of the past and people that resemble them are treated as such generally. Pattern recognition is a part of human survival that has let people avoid predators reasonably well. New patterns cannot be formed before they occur, before people get bloodied so successful social predators can sometimes make it right to the top. Who would ever have voted for Stalin or Hitler if they had known what would result.

One should be sure about bullying-are the perpetrators actually aware of their offensive conduct and intending to continue it? Is there conduct really not within their rights to do so legally and socially? If there are no legal remedies available to stop the behavior one may need to consider providing negative stimuli to the bully's activities.

It is good to disregard offensive behavior ofttimes according to Christian doctrine, and becoming offended by others without forgiveness can draw one 'offsides' in to murky areas of conduct. Some elements of society are sacred cows today that may not be treated equally or impartially, and the government may be a bully as are the broadcast media a bunch of bullies and goons corrupting American politics. Some families may have double income earners while some single individuals cannot ever get a decent job. Society promotes the 'haves' and punishes the 'have nots'. Just this day I heard the CEO of Forbes magazine say that if the stop market drops over the next several years he may need to live in the basement of the radio interviewer 'Scott'. The advantaged today are simultaneously the poor and deserving underclass as well as the rich while the poor 'bike' or 'tent' 're-tidering' as they cannot find work. Even if the nation prospers again these poor people will remain poor as enemies of the corrupt class of broadcasters.

Where does bullying cross the line from mean and abusive behavior by adults and children. Shouldn't adults have the right to duel there oppressors with quick draws or bullets formally launched after arrangements were made by seconds? Can law authorities police the broadcast media meaningfully without first amendment litigation following closely/ Isn't radio a good way for Mexican mafias to gain influence in the United States in their own language? Did the founders intend a live goonery to subvert the reality of material living and work for Americans. Isn't radio and T.V. a sort of invasive, advertising and supremacy class assaulting life continuously? Couldn't advertising be done instead just

• << previous page
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• next page >>

Add your voice

Know something about Causes of prejudice and bullying (and what you can do about them)?
We want to hear your view. Write now!