There are 50 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #31 by Helium's members.
Manager or Leader? Ideally, it's both. Reality proves this is not often the case. Leadership development has been all the rage since the first alpha Neanderthal got eaten and the rest of the clan had no one to turn to. People need leadership. They want to believe. But they can produce without good leadership if they respect their management. The bottom line is garnering the respect of your subordinates.
Without it, your effectiveness is seriously undermined. But here's where the difference between a manager and a leader resides. A leader recognizes that once they have your respect they're just starting.
Earning respect will increase output, but how can we get higher output while maintaining or boosting morale? The answer is leadership. A leader demonstrates a willingness to hear ideas, to roll up his sleeves when necessary, and fortitude to make correction when required. However, when leadership is in short supply, management can still get the job done.
In recent decades "manager" has evolved into the homely stepsister of "leader". I personally don't understand this phenomenon. People will still come to work every day even if they don't have Vince Lombardi firing them up with the pre-game speech. Obligation and money are powerful motivators. The kids will still need braces and the house will still need a new roof long after Vince retires.
So why is "leader" the exalted one, when "manager" tends the shop? The truth is leadership is revered because it is an idea. Leadership can work in the abstract while management has to produce day in and day out. Leadership with no managerial skills can still steer the ship into the rocks. He'll just look darn good doing it.
The gold standard is when both manager and leader coincide. That's the guy we all clamor to work for. Who doesn't want to work for a guy that makes you feel like the company will collapse without your contribution?
So if the question is leader or manager? The answer is and always will be both; through constant personal development. Washington and Lincoln did not reach greatness by being born. They learned it through constant and rigorous self improvement. Anything less and you are not only shortchanging yourself, but those you manage, and the company that gave you the responsibility.
Learn more about this author, J. Ryan Mcdaniel.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Management is the planning, coordinating, directing, supervising and organising resources (human, material and financ... read more
by Charles Ray
In his biography "My American Journey" Colin Powell defined leadership as "the art of achieving what the science of m... read more
What is leadership? How is it different from management? While it would seem that leadership should be relatively si... read more
by Joseph Wardy
There are significant differences between a manager and a leader. As a management development trainer, there are many... read more
Are you a leader or a manager? Leadership means promoting new directions. Management means executing existing directi... read more
View All Articles on:
Being a manager vs. being a leader
Add your voice
Know something about Being a manager vs. being a leader?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Already a member? Log in.
Featured Partner
Sunshine Week is a nonpartisan, good-government effort led by the American Society of Newspaper Editors, but with a c...more
hide