3 of 103

Write now Article Tools

Free speech does not mean a right to unlimited physical power or domination of an electronic communication spectrum-democracy is about the containment of unlimited power such as the broadcast media and the reallocation of such exclusive power to the people and populism from elite, globalist interests.

The public should own the broadcast media. Free speech isn't synonymous with absolute communications hegemony with all the advantages of live treachery and subtle sophism's in manipulating the masses. The corporate media are fired if they do not support the will of advertisers and corporate syndicates. The opinions of the broadcast media are not ordinary, average, honest or representative of the political will of anybody besides the wealthiest and most repressive elements of society in support of globalism. Even the licentious may be repressive of intelligent alternate economic development and policies for national security. The broadcast media and the entertainment industry have developed to pacify the republic down in to globalist corporate control.

Transnational corporations own the broadcast media in the U.S.A. The public is free to listen to their political lectures and choose from column A or B, Hillary or Thompson, Indonesia or Mexico, Charybdis or Scylla.

Print media require freedom of speech yet are fairly accountable legally for it. Broadcast media may be an invasive and intimidating tool for racketeering the founders never intended as alive way to subvert the private lives of individuals and control people politically with brainwashing. Mexican drug cartels may purchase radio stations in America for code word coordination of shipments perhaps...the possibilities of live broadcasting media for organizing crime are first rate-it was certainly helpful in the Rwandan genocide.

Corporations and governments are the only ones free speech on the airwaves. They own it and should not be the only ones with mass broadcast wavelength speech freedom. As it is only the rich and powerful have freedom of speech on am and fm radio while the public is gagged. The founders would have believed that podcasts and Internet citizen ties should be use instead. The founders would have been against just Torries and the Imperial Government having free speech while every Tom Paine was silenced until he could be hung to twist slowly in the wind.

The public should have freedom of speech. The broadcast media should be used by the democracy for Internet downloads with a new technology and

• 1
• 2
• next page >>

Add your voice

Know something about Should the media have freedom of speech??
We want to hear your view. Write now!