"Good without What: Whose morality?"

The obvious hidden assumption here is that there is a good, good is knowable, and good is also attainable or retainable after beliefs in God have been abandoned. Another assumption is that secular humanism equals, leads followers towards, or is in some other way connected with morality. The following is only a brief philosophical analysis of both assumptions:

First assumption: What is "Good"?

"Good", must mean that something is beneficial only for the ones who believe it is favorable to them and theirs. Utopian "good" is not (and could never be) knowable, but more importantly is also not (and never could be) a reality. What is good for me is obviously not good for some, and what is good for many may definitely not be good for me. Good is a word that has a subjective meaning to the one who holds the belief about the nature of the stuff in question. It is similar to the word "love" in that it only has a subjective meaning to the one who holds the belief, and to the degree believed to be felt about the subject in question.

So a good with or without G/god(s) must encounter the same ambiguity. For claiming there could be a "Good without God" is like claiming there could be a "Love without perception", or conversely, claiming that there is only some "Good with God", is like claiming that there is only some "Love with perception." So, what is good therefore must serve the ones who hold the belief about its benefits to them, and the love for a pet is believed to be not the same as a love for child. Belief is so very important in this line of thinking because we all have formed our views about "good" and "love" and other such words based on our experiences in relationship with our environmental conditions and conditioning.

Second assumption: Whose morality?

"Morality", without going into the same argument of ambiguity above, must also benefit the believer. If a poor person robs a rich person because the rich person has so exploited the poor person's labor for his own profit for far too long, that she is left with nothing but her struggle to survive, through who and to whom will morality benefit? Exactly, it wholly depends on beliefs that are held that through who and to whom will morality benefit! One may claim that "stealing is wrong", while another will claim that "exploiting others labor is wrong". One may claim that "exploiting another's labor ensures a better life in this world", while

• 1
• 2
• next page >>

---

Add your voice

Know something about Good without God: Secular humanism and morality?
We want to hear your view. Write now!