H.G. Wells brought this science fiction novel to us a long time ago but the story still remains fresh. Space exploration has barely scratched the surface of our own solar system and people are still left wondering if there really is life out there somewhere in the universe.
The radio version of War of the Worlds caused mass hysteria in the early part of the twentieth century. Science fiction was not nearly as popular then as it has become now. People were inclined to believe that an invasion from space was possible. Hearing it on the radio made it seem all the more real.
The original movie version had lots of the same things. It was made early enough that it preceded most of the big science fiction stories to come. Orson Wells was a well known personality by then and hearing his voice in the movie gave much the same effect to the viewers as the radio program had done.
The more recent version starring Tom Cruise, however, came far too late for any of that. Certainly by the time this film came out viewers were far more aware of their universe than people were back when the original came out. The fear factor was far lower as a result. The special effects were certainly better than what was available for the original film. That is to be expected given the fifty or so year difference between the two releases.
The basic story remained the same. Invaders from outer space suddenly and without warning drop from the sky. At first they appear to be just meteorites striking the planet. But something comes out of each of the impacts and it turns out they are super tanks filled with aliens bent on destruction of the human race. Ultimately both versions of the story end the same way as the book did. As abruptly as they began their conquest their demise strikes them down. Biological organisms eventually stop the aliens in their tracks. Of all of the possible outcomes this one is the most profound for H.G. Wells to have come up with. In reality it is the most likely thing in the world. If you meet some other form of life isn't it likely that some kind of disease would kill one of you? It seems so obvious now but for Wells to have thought of this back when he wrote the story seems rather mind-boggling.
The one major deviation in this version of the story that I could see was the episode at the house of the crazy guy hiding in his basement. This was not in the original film nor did it really add all that much but time filler to this version.
Tom cruise and his co-star seemed to do an adequate job of conveying the fear and the shock of the invasion. The special effects were very good. Overall though I still consider remakes to be cheap. If a remake doesn't really add something to a story then it is really just Hollywood making an extra buck or two off of a retread. There are plenty of fresh stories and scripts for Hollywood to make movies from. They do not need to rehash every old movie that has been made in the past.
Learn more about this author, Joseph Mohr.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Joseph Mohr
H.G. Wells brought this science fiction novel to us a long time ago but the story still remains fresh. Space exploration
I have to say that I am not a great Sci Fi movie addict, but I was visually impressed with the remake of the 2005 Steven
by Will Kester
If you live to be old, you get to see a lot of remakes; not much reward for getting old. Remakes of movies are often ill
by X
When H.G. Wells WAR OF THE WORLDS first appeared in 1898, the approaching 20th. Century seemed to promise relative peace
by Paul Jones
First published in 1898, H.G. Wells book "The War Of The Worlds" is an engrossing read even in the light of the hundred
View All Articles on:
Movie remakes: Comparing the original War of the Worlds with the 2005 remake
Add your voice
Know something about Movie remakes: Comparing the original War of the Worlds with the 2005 remake?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
The MAGIC Foundation for children's growth
Major Aspects of Growth In Children (MAGIC) is made up of 25,000+ families whose children (and affected adults) have ...more
hide