There are 45 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #21 by Helium's members.
Removing relegion is an interesting idea, but it presents some of the same problems as Anarchy does on a logistic level, it only works, if the idea is introduced to a society that has never known it. You can't force people to no longer practice religion, you can prevent them from doing so publically, but if history has taught us anything, religion, and those who practice it will find a way to continue, so if a society has known religion, there is no way to eliminate it.
But, even when presented with a new society, how does one prevent religion? If a group of 100 people were taken, and isolated at birth, and raised without a concept of religion, they woudl still look to one source for guidance, be it another member of the group, or something intangible outside the group, these people would probably wonder where they came from, and, depending on how much information they were given, woudl probably create theories, its a given that they exist, therefore somethign created them, they are isolated, so they cannot see or hear that which created them, so, it is either somewhere they are not, or non-tangible.
In a quick paragraph, I've just created a god, not THE god, but a god, a force that exists through implication that created these people, if we were to leave this group isolated for 2-3 generations, I gaurantee you their anscestors would be talking about the force that created all of them, and musing on its intent.
My point with this example, is that man, as a whole, can't exist without religion, and it doesn't matter what the religion is, from early paganism, to modern Islam and Christianity, to Scientology, to the Greek and Roman Panteons, man will look to a higher being, even if that higher being is just the one person who takes control.
So its an interesting idea, but its fundamentally impossible, and fairly pointless, religion is a mask for war, if not for that we'd find other reasons, skin color, the economy, you name it, we'll fight over it.
the truth, is that we keep trying to find ways to go against human nature, and its fairly futile, we can strive to create small pockets of peace, but eventually we'll war, we'll kill in the name of something, we'll believe in something other than ourselves, we'll love, we'll procreate and we'll want what'd not ours, and protect what is ours with everythign we have, its just how we work.
Learn more about this author, Christopher Harrison.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Robert Irvin
This question is critically dependent on how one chooses to define religion. If by religion one means an organized c... read more
How many religions are there in the world? There are many religions in the world and there are many followers of diff... read more
by Henri Martin
When you think about it don't we all believe in the same way? I mean the only difference I honestly see is one cultu... read more
To begin with this will never happen. There will always be religion. Until the constitution of man is completely chan... read more
by Marie Devine
Should there be no religion in your life? You have a God given right to decide that. Some people decide yes and ot... read more
View All Articles on:
Should there be no religion
Add your voice
Know something about Should there be no religion?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Already a member? Log in.
Cast your vote!
Click for your side. Must be logged in.
Featured Partner
Concepts4Charity has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Concepts4Charity ...more
hide