by Centralist Business Initiatives K. D. Lecy

Created on: January 30, 2011   Last Updated: February 01, 2011

Written: Sun, January 30, 2011 4:40:17 PM

REFORMING GOVERNMENT CONTROLLED MENTAL HEALTH CARE FACILITIES INITIATIVE

[^revised]

I have been researching local government run behavior health care facilities for the past 12 months and found that these facilities are more interested in the bottom dollar then serving citizens in need. And strikingly so, recently these facilities have been used mainly to fabricate diagnoses against citizens who think for themselves, as to imply individualism is a sign of mental disease. It is unfortunate certain behaviors that do not fit the current government wants it branded as a dysfunction. It is the disrespect of speech that has prompted government officials to use mental labels against Americans.

It is my opinion, local government run mental health care facilities are a racket. A unionized racket. And I say that because unfortunately since 9/11 our country has fallen into the hands of people that could care less about providing service, and are more concerned with what they can get to be served. It is the era of the war against terror. The era where anyone, even Americans, can be accused of horrendous behavior without the use of factual evidence to back it up. Hearsay, assumption and speculation are the new laws that govern our society.

Government officials, at any given time, can say whatever they want about you, and there is nothing the person can do about it. Is in itself is a human right violation.

US government has deemed human rights violation as a constructive form of social control. As if abuse produces conformity because it doesn't. What abuse does is cause the individual to react in an adverse manner, thus leaving a greater chance for violence to erupt. So being that there is a greater probability violence will erupt, what does that say about this new form of government global security measures? It says security doesn't exist. But isn't that the rational behind this agenda? Lack of security produces evidence for politically charged war against dissent. What is this evidence built, it is but the natural reaction of persons victimized by an abuser.

Red flags need to be raised when government officials main objective is to inflict pain, in hopes citizens end up with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Why is the US government causing emotional/psychological distress? In hopes PTSD sufferers comply to an even more abusive government? Is the next phase coming? This new government global security force is in itself, the destructiveness,

• 1
• 2
• Next Page >>