Home > Religion & Spirituality > Religious Concepts > Thoughts on God
Created on: January 07, 2011 Last Updated: January 09, 2011
Creationism and evolution do not need to be mutually exclusive, although many make you think so. These two are either true or not true and we know they both are. First, why faithful believers feel they need to abandon Creation to appease Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection is a mystery.
The Bible tells us that God took a rib from the side of Adam to create Eve not to mention the limited number of animals Noah was permitted to bring aboard his boat during the Great Flood. It stands to reason that "like does beget like" and even unlike as the lowly mule shows us - and probably why that animal carries the stigma of being the most stubborn.
The problem arises when one adheres strictly to the account of six days in Genesis. God has already said in the Bible that "one day is as a thousand years" in God's sight - but evolution, as we know, took millions of years to evolve. It helps to understand that time can be relative (think about time zones and day-light savings for example and leap year). Why a day millions of years ago has to be literally a 24-hour period when we know even atomic clock specialists today tinker a second or two around every so often due to the change in the sun's orbit is a quandary. The only thing we know for sure is that there was a revolution of the sun which according to Genesis apparently did not show up right away. Light could have been referring to other sources like electromagnatism, protons, nuclear or even metaphysical. If the universe was smaller at the time of the Big Bang, maybe there were several suns or moons nearby to push and pull and motivate.
Evolution or natural selection from base organisms appears to discount God's creation of man and woman, but how many times has God said "from dust you were taken" or that he is the potter and we are the clay? Apparently when we die our base elements return from whence they came. It is the spiritual nature of mankind that no one can destroy, where neither rust nor moths can enter in. God would not have to be so reassuring about "decomposition" robbing us of our Godly inheritance, if it were not a scientific fact that we will in fact decompose back to the soil. Our bones and teeth may take a little longer, God understood good engineering, however, they go too eventually and sometimes simply as we age.
Creationists want nothing more than to support the Creator, who creates each and every day. If at the
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Why do the theories of creation and evolution have to be mutually exclusive
by Brian Birk
I had a seminary professor who said that he did not have a problem with the big bang theory of the creation of the universe.
Can the Bible be trusted? Does the theory of evolution disprove the Bible? Are they mutually exclusive, or is the problem
Creationism and evolution do not need to be mutually exclusive, although many make you think so. These two are either true
Creation and evolution. Why do these two concepts have to be "mutually exclusive"? There is only one answer here- they aren't
Using creation theory within evolutionary theory would be a backward step for researchers. It should remain separate from
View All Articles on: Why do the theories of creation and evolution have to be mutually exclusive
Featured Partner
My hope is that every person with cancer can smile because someone touched his or her life. So many of you made Nicki smile! I never imagined that I would devote my life to this cause, but when cancer touched my life it changed everyth...more