Home > Society & Lifestyle > Ethnicity & Gender > Gender Issues
Created on: March 06, 2007 Last Updated: April 30, 2007
The question fails to address the underlying definitions necessary to understand the full implications and ramifications of answering it simply one way or another.
Firstly, "we" are not compelled to "approve" of anything. So lets move the discussion out of the realm of the touchy-feely emotions and deal concisely with the issue of civil marriage.
Secondly, let us understand that same sex civil marriage is already occurring in many nations AND within the US in Massachusetts. Furthermore, same sex marriage has been occuring in every American state for a very long time under the auspicies of Ecclestiacal Law or Canon; that is to say, the religious laws of various institutions of worship which perform and recognize such ceremonies. Families have attended such ceremonies and recognize same sex partners as wife and wife or husband and husband. Furthermore, the contracts of marriage formally signed by same sex couples and witnessed with notary acts are enforcable under the terms of contract law. HOWEVER, CIVIL LAW appears to be the thrust and crux of the issue here.
What same sex couples are seeking are the Civil Privileges that their elected representatives can provide by passing Civil Statutory Legislation and having it enter into the force and effect of Statutory Law, forcing various arms of the state (which is regulated by the government) to provide same sex couples with benefits equal to those provided to opposite sex couples. This is a reliance on the social welfare state to provide licenses and permits which grant certain privileges. These privileges are removable and changable as are all civil "rights" which rest upon and reside with the will of the government to continue to provide them. These are NOT to be confused with fuandamental, natural rights which are INALIENABLE and unaffected by acts of government or state and reside with the individual regardless of budgetary changes and political winds.
Case in point: Israeli marriages are registered in the church in which the couple gets married. No government enters the picture. Only recently was a government marriage registry established as many interfaith couples were not allowed to marry in churches that did not recognize the faith of their nonmembers as valid. Churches marry you, churches issue you copies of your marriage certificate, and churches benefit as private businesses by the industry that they engage in.
America: Entrepeneurs wishing to set up a private marriage registry will be arrested for
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Approving same sex marriage
Same Sex Marriage: Looking at America's Double Standard
If one wants to take a detailed look at same-sex marriage, one
I now pronounce you Adam and Steve or I now pronounce you Anna and Eve. Such pronouncements are increasingly becoming the
When a person is a tax paying, law abiding citizen, should they be treated as equals? The answer has been and will continue
Marriage: Right or Privilege?
Is marriage in the United States a right similar to the Freedom of Speech guaranteed under
Two weeks before California declared banning same-sex unions unconstitutional, the state senate in Pennsylvania tabled a
View All Articles on: Approving same sex marriage