Home > Arts & Humanities > History > US History > 20th & 21st Century US History
Created on: September 23, 2010
An Unnecessary Evil: Reassessing the Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Abstract
This paper asserts the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not necessary for Japan’s surrender. Several alternatives to the atomic bombings are discussed. United States military forces decimated much of Japan’s ground and air forces which severely reduced Japan’s fighting ability. Precision bombing destroyed most of Japan’s industrial capacity and its ability to replenish weapons and supplies. America’s naval blockade reduced Japan’s fighting ability even further. Invasion by the Soviet Union shocked the Japanese government in to considering “surrender [to the United States] before the USSR was able to dictate terms” (Hasegawa, 1993). Finally, this paper examines opposing viewpoints that contend the atomic bombings spared American forces from a costly invasion and saved additional lives.
Introduction
“Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts, and supported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved, it is the Survey’s opinion that certainly prior to 31 December 1945, and in all probability prior to 1 November 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated” (Nitze, 1946, p.26). Paul Nitze’s conclusion represents early controversy surrounding the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Since then, historians, politicians, and the public have argued if the bombings were necessary to obtain Japan’s surrender.
Without atomic bombs, many within President Harry S. Truman’s administration believed Japan would never surrender. Saving hundreds of thousands of American lives from a costly invasion of mainland Japan justified the atomic bombs. However, his administration overlooked alternatives to the atomic bombs. The United States severely diminished Japan’s military capability. The invasion of Manchuria by the Soviet Union stressed it even further, leading many within Japan’s leadership to considered surrender. The decimation of Japan’s ground and air forces, US military strategies of precision bombing and naval blockade, and Soviet invasion showed that the atomic bombings
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Judging Truman's decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan
by J. Van
The dispute between orthodox and so-called "revisionist" versions of the Hiroshima decision has been going on for six decades.
The concept of morality is ever changing, shifting, becoming entangled with the imperfect psyche that is shaped by the experiences
by Ray Peters
On August 6, 1945, a lone Boeing B-29 Superfortress dropped a single bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. With a searing
by James Harvey
May 1945- The European theater of war was beginning to wind down as it was becoming apparent that the allied forces were
The Bombing of Hiroshima
On August 6th, an American B29 bomber dropped the first of two atomic bombs on the Japanese
View All Articles on: Judging Truman's decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan
Featured Partner
Marching Mountains organizes at the grassroots level while creating and leveraging Internet technology to empower our networks of involved people. Marching Mountains seeks grants and corporate sponsorship in addition to fundraising to pr...more