Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Politics > US Elections
Created on: September 12, 2010 Last Updated: October 26, 2010
Any title that associates a name with a cult is an insult to that name, and since insults do more harm than good, this article will address the insult itself, with a few common sense tips on how to address the question this title asks. First we must see the difference between an insult of a cult and members of a group who support and stand by any man at any given time. This article will also address the questions we need to ask ourselves when it comes to stereotypical views we continue to look through.
Our American experience with cults have helped us understand that anyone who becomes a member of a cult is naive, to say the least, so the main question this article will address is this: Does a cult or the second coming have anything to do with Obama in the first place?
The question is answered when we understand the difference between eye sight and insight, and through my view, it’s safe to assume that Obama has nothing to do with the second coming, nor is he the guru of irrationally naive people. This title, "doth protest too much," and creates a vision that rational people don’t see, much less bother to read.
It’s true that since 2008 when the first black democrat with an Arabic name became the president of the United States, a lot of people became irrational right off the bat. In fact, they were so afraid that the rest of us felt as if they were lost and alone in "The Twilight Zone," a time in space where nothing makes sense, so to answer the question this article asks, we must see and understand what a cult is and what it isn’t.
A cult’s guru makes false claims in the name of God to produce a sense of doom and gloom because the cult’s Guru is hungry for power, fame and the cash it takes to keep his people in their place. That’s why a guru controls what his people think, say and do. Even so, no matter what the cult chooses to believe, the facts remain the same.
In this case, the fact remains that the name Barrack Hussein Obama is just a name he was given at birth, not an indication of his religious views, his personality issues or his worth. When asked how he got a name like that, he explained that had his parents known that he’d one day become the president of the United States, they’d have named him something else, but the facts remain the same. It’s just a name, not unlike millions of American names whose heritage contains a mix of diversity, and yet, just the sound of our president’s
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The Obama cult: Is the Second Coming nigh?
by Francis Jock
More than any other political group in the world today, American conservatives are obsessed with the election of Barack
by Bob Schmidt
There are a lot of reasons why Obama runs a great risk that his supporters may be considered to be part of the Obama cult.
by Jerry Curtis
Urbane, a gifted speaker, and a man who seems to light up the room with his classy wife and great looking children, Barack
by Robert Tesla
Is Obama responsible for the Second Coming? Was Napoleon? Or what about Kim Jong Il? Every single time
by Vicki Phipps
Any title that associates a name with a cult is an insult to that name, and since insults do more harm than good, this article
View All Articles on: The Obama cult: Is the Second Coming nigh?
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Does giving effective speeches make an effective president?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Environment Northeast (ENE) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse ENE's featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. Share what you know, lear...more