by Shaun Wing

Created on: September 10, 2010   Last Updated: September 12, 2010

If I said you had a beautiful body would you hold it against me? 

Oddly enough our level of sensitive receptivity has not changed in our recent utopia to my knowledge. We are not walking about with antennas waving above our heads trying to pick out offensive language we can complain about, in anyway we oblige. So, why is the number of complaint offices increasing? Well it has to do with our obsessive behaviour against the norm. The governmental departments have successfully infiltrated this type of activity, because it creates more data about our own lives. And this is what a 'nanny state' wants the UK public to do more of. By submitting all these strange discrepancies under the headline a 'freedom of speech;' 'data protection' and 'information transparency,' it tells them a lot about who we are? And that information is worth a lot of money to the corporate world. Many of you are sensible with the data you provide on the open market but sadly, the consensus of the 'politically correct,' 'freedom of speech' is configured to the easily offended, and that makes authorities nervous. In their response, the over reaction card plays effect. 

In the olden days 'if you call Wolf too many times, you'll more likely be ignored.' Blatantly, this phrase has been long forgotten, but there is a reason for it, hence, why it is invented in the first-place. The overtly sensitive tend to be melodramatic, also incoherent of own misgivings and invent misinterpretations that may cause offence to third parties, as a dutiful right, under the umbrella of 'freedom of speech.' Yes, the 'easily offended,' offends more than most. I'm not stating it's incorrect to view opinions, though it's more important to act out the democracy concept, to show openness and learn from different spectrums. The biggest culprits are those who claim they have the right of siding with an opinion, yet engage purposefully with snide negative dialogue. 

The structure of speech is a total compromise, whom too many do not compromise over. Clearly, the concept of a Western culture portraying varieties of personalities won't exist, and it starts by acting on behalf of other parties who are absent at the time and claiming that stances are offensive 'on behalf' of other parties. This trend of freedom of speech is increasing its power; they're realizing anything is possible if the prose is organized and coordinated via the correct means, and going through the direct channels. They're stance maybe way off

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next Page >>