1 of 1

Write now Article Tools

Page 2 of 2

trying to hunt through the site for specific articles. Trying to find articles recommending, for example, Windows software can be achieved by using the search tool, which is decent enough, but it would be nice to be able to surf through specific categories of posts. In fact, the only real way I had found of surfing the site initially was either by using the search or by physically surfing every single page (and the articles are ordered by date, so you can imagine how many pages there are). Each post has "Read more" tags for you to follow, but these are essentially search engine results, so you'll get the same options from clicking on a "downloads" tag as you would from typing downloads into the search engine.

However, a few weeks after discovering the site, I did eventually find the "archive" link at the bottom of the navigation bar which gave me access to the past articles by month or by category which has helped me find the stuff I want and access it quickly. I do still tend to surf through the site semi-randomly as I find that's the best way of using the site. Often the bits of information and downloads I find most useful are those I stumble upon rather than search for specifically.

Site speed isn't the quickest (even on broadband), probably due to the amount of images and adverts used on each page and I have noticed a few layout quirks in both Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.1 and Internet Explorer 7, but nothing that really impedes access to any areas of the site. Ordinarily, the relatively poor navigation coupled with less than good site speed would be a huge negative aspect for a website, but I think the excellent quality of the content more than makes up for these minor site quirks.

Finally, lifehacker does have an element of feedback and it can be possible to register and comment on various stories as well as offer feedback and make suggestions. However, I found their method of attracting users to be quite off-putting. While it's possible to directly email the site with ideas (the email address is listed prominently), if you want to join the community, then you might run into trouble. You can post a comment if you choose, but comments are vetted before being displayed and not just for the usual 'sins' of racism, flaming etc. (which is admittedly sensible) but also of 'interest'. If your comment is not interesting enough to the site administrators, then it won't get displayed. I'm not a huge fan of this as I think it goes against the site's ideals about getting stuff done. Why should I waste my time posting a comment that might not be displayed? In fact, I've already done this and while the comment was eventually posted on the site, there was no confirmation email that this had happened.

If you're looking for ways to streamline your life and be more productive (not just in how quickly you can do things, but what you can do), then I really do think that you'll find a lot of the articles on this site useful, with more being added every day. Lifehacker.com has enough quality content to warrant being a five star site, however the minor site foibles in terms of navigation, speed and layout coupled with the ludicrous commenting criteria mean that I'm having trouble giving out a full five stars. I will still recommend the site with the caveat that there might be a steeper than required learning curve to get the best out of it, but perseverance will bring reward.

Learn more about this author, The Duke.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

• << previous page
• 1
• 2

Add your voice

Know something about Website reviews: Lifehacker.com?
We want to hear your view. Write now!