Home > Politics, News & Issues > Political & Economic Theory
Created on: August 25, 2010 Last Updated: August 28, 2010
The right to bear arms was made in a time when the United States had a highly unstable government, small army, and was very likely to get invaded by the European superpowers, especially the United Kingdom. The colonists needed firearms to protect against wild animals, and today it is highly unlikely to get dragged away by a rabid bear in New York. Because the government was unstable and could easily be corrupted or infiltrated by British spies or redcoats, the citizens needed a way of fighting against any tyranny of a person trying to install a dictatorship, or fighting against a national army, because it was hard to move soldiers around the country fast enough, they would have some militia to fight against European superpowers.
Today the USA has good relations with the UK and the European Union, and has an immense army, in fact the biggest and probably the most powerful army. Today, people who buy guns usually collect them simply to exercise their constitutional right. In Europe, for around one-thousand years the countries have had very powerful and mobile armies, so they had, and have no need to own a firearm. Although there are very tight laws on how to get them, they are generally only available to security guards, farmers and police firearm specialists, and are usually only allowed a BB gun, Air Gun, Pistol, or shotgun.
Armed police specialists have a wider range of weapons and mostly use pistols, sub-machine guns, and sniper rifles. People use guns for self-defence, however, firearms are too deadly to comply with self-defence laws to qualify as self-defence, as self-defence is only self-defence until the attacker is unable to attack or knocked out. Serious injury is considered assault by law.
Guns are also sometimes used against attackers with guns, but armed specialists in the police are allowed to deal with these when on duty if deadly force is definitely needed, otherwise it is just as unlawful as the criminal. Civilians have no need to have guns, as unarmed combat can suffice to neutralise any threat to self well-being and health. Most citizens do not own a gun, so it could be at least limited to small pistols if it gained adequate votes from citizens.
In America, it is very unlikely that guns will be banned, as it is in the written American constitution, and it is sometimes seen as a patriot, especially right-wing citizens, to own a gun to defend against invaders.
Learn more about this author, Robert Muirhead.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The politics of gun control
by Joseph Veca
The politics of gun control break down very easily into two distinct groups. The RKBA (Right to Keep and Bear Arms) advocacy
by Tommy Walton
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants", Thomas Jefferson. It was
Inasmuch as the arguments from both right and left make sense, this is a difficult issue to take a side on. The political
Gun Control
Every time there is a news report of famous people or public figures being shot by some crazed gunman, the topic
The right to bear arms was made in a time when the United States had a highly unstable government, small army, and was very
View All Articles on: The politics of gun control
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Should taxpayers have a bigger say in local government spending?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting
The Pulitzer Center promotes in-depth engagement with global affairs through its sponsorship of quality international journalism across all media platforms and an innovative program of outreach and education.more