Home > Politics, News & Issues > News > People in the News
Created on: August 02, 2010
Whenever someone on the left in America wants to immediately shut down any and all criticisms (however valid) of the disastrous policies of leftists, their default tactic is to accuse the person they disagree with of being racist - even when the subject of discussion had absolutely nothing to do with race at all.
I read a great article by Selwyn Duke at American Thinker titled,
"Hello, I'm a Racist, Pleased to Meet You" which was about how the left uses false accusations of racism to deflect and derail any LEGITIMATE criticism of Obama's POLICIES and how the pitiful deer in the headlights response of the victims of those false accusations is pretty much guaranteed.
Excerpt:
'But frankly, too many of you are saps. You really don't get it. People who advocated welfare reform in the 1990s were accused of being "racist." If you're for border control, you're "racist." If you criticize Obama, you're "racist." If you oppose quotas, you're "racist." If you say that, be it nature or nurture, there are differences among groups, you're "racist." If you want English to be the national language, you're "racist." The word has become meaningless, used only to stifle and stigmatize opposition. And if calling you a heretic worked in that regard, the left would do that. And if calling you a Fig Newton worked, they would do that.
Nevertheless, the ploy prevents sap conservatives from speaking - and even conceiving of - certain truths. They won't say that so-called racial profiling is just part of proper profiling, they pay lip service to the relativistic idea that all cultures are morally equal, they refuse to call bigoted blacks such as Obama and Eric Holder out on their bigotry, they tolerate double standards with respect to hate crime-law application and racial jokes, and they let whites persecuted for making innocent comments twist in the wind. They won't speak unfashionable truths for fear of becoming unfashionable people.'
As the article correctly states, the default accusation of racism is nothing more than PROPAGANDA and in a war against the enemy (which this clearly IS) you do not respond to slanderous propaganda by wasting your time trying to prove it wrong, you do not let that propaganda get to you at all, no, what you do is fight the freaking enemy and maybe even come up with your OWN propaganda, which is based in facts (not fiction like the propaganda of the CRAPTASTICs). The Nazis used propaganda, so did the Soviets - did we waste our time trying to
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Should anyone be guilty by accusation
by MJ Stevenson
Whenever someone on the left in America wants to immediately shut down any and all criticisms (however valid) of the disastrous
Padilla Guilty By Accusation
Alleged terrorist Jose Padilla was recently convicted of federal terrorism support charges.
by Stella Kaye
HOW FALSE ACCUSATIONS CONVICT THE INNOCENT
In a fair and just society it should not be possible for a defendant to be convicted
Is Padilla guilty? I don't know, I wasn't in the court room. however, the fact that he wasn't tried for the dirty bomb threat
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Do you believe the 17 pregnant teenagers in Gloucester, Massachusetts made a "pregnancy pact"?
Click for your side.