Home > Politics, News & Issues > Political & Economic Theory
Created on: July 17, 2010
In the American status quo, some people convicted of serious crimes (e.g. felons) permanently lose the right to vote. This is a controversial idea that can be applied in any democratic society. But in this type of society, felons willfully disregard social contract in interest of personal gain, thus negate their own rights in society. Moreover, restoring rights to such criminals destroys the government's credibility in maintaining personal responsibility.
This argument takes its basis in justice, operating primarily on the Platonic definition of giving one one's due. This means appropriately punishing and rewarding individuals for their actions. This applies to the ultimate question of this topic by showing that upholding laws is just; therefore, violating laws through the committal of a felony is unjust. Ergo, one threatens justice by performing felonies and deserves adequate reduction of rights in society. As the right to vote is the distinguishing ability of citizens in a democracy, it understandably is removed.
To further bolster the foundation of this position, one must look to preserving social contract, as John Locke's philosophy is central to the foundation of democracy. As social contract dictates a mutual relationship between the governed and those who govern, flagrantly disregarding reasonable laws set forth for the benefit of society clearly equates to violating the social contract. By ignoring a fundamental principle of democracy, the felon's action is obviously unjust, while preserving societal order through maintaining social contract keeps citizens following laws, achieving justice.
For clarification, the following definitions are provided:
From the Oxford English Dictionary:
Society: A political alliance, league, or compact.
Felony: the general name for a class of crimes which may loosely be said to be regarded by the law as of a graver character than those called misdemeanors (or, in short, a serious crime)
Responsible: Morally accountable for one's actions; capable of rational conduct, Capable of fulfilling an obligation or trust; reliable, trustworthy; of good credit and repute.
From Princeton University:
social contract: an implicit agreement among people that results in the organization of society; individual surrenders liberty in return for protection
Enfranchisement in a democratic society should be retained by responsible citizens. As responsible inherently encompasses fulfilling obligations, such as social contract, the vote should
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Convicted prisoners' right to vote in elections
In the American status quo, some people convicted of serious crimes (e.g. felons) permanently lose the right to vote. This
Why shouldn't convicted felons retain their right to vote? I can only speak from experience, as a convicted felon myself
When an individual breaks the law of the land and is duly convicted, they give up certain of their rights, sometimes for
What people fail to realize that voting is not a right. It's a PRIVILEGE.
I'm still wondering why people think that these
Prisoners loss of rights! A touchy issue for a lot of people. If you're the victim of a criminal, your tendency
View All Articles on: Convicted prisoners' right to vote in elections
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Does the current Government stance on Cannabis fail our kids?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Northwoods Wildlife Center has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Northwoods' featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. Share what you know,...more