Home > Food & Drink > Food & Drink (Other)
Created on: June 23, 2010 Last Updated: July 29, 2010
Nowadays, much of the organic versus non-organic farming propaganda seems to be anecdotal in nature. To illustrate the point, here are the stereotypes regarding the two camps of polarized thought: non-organic farmers thunder about in enormous tractors, obliviously destroying eco-systems, producing massive yields for evil Ag conglomerates and are basically grass-chewing, millionaire hicks, whereas, organic farmers are wild-eyed hippies, smoking granola, screaming radical epithets, in harmony with nature and blessed with a mystical new age green thumb. Somewhere in between, actual farming lies, and so does the truth. Let’s talk about reality and see where the discussion goes.
*Cost. Organic costs more – sometimes double or triple non-organic costs. Check your shopping receipt if you’re a doubter. But do you get the quality that you pay for? That would depend upon what you want, but, there are other intangibles to consider. Does the idea make you happy and can you afford it? If you’re not sure, you may have to balance your finances versus your health, nutritional and environmental concerns. Winner: non-organic.
*Nutrition. The Food & Drug Administration (FDA) hasn’t declared that organic food is more nutritious, or even safer, for that matter. There are many studies out there, but it’s like comparing apples and oranges even in the best of circumstances. That’s because nutrition is an average value mostly based upon a locality; soil, plant stock, fertilizers, weather conditions and the time of planting and harvesting all make each piece of produce virtually unique. To some extent, the same applies to livestock. Like real estate, it’s all location, location, location. Winner: none.
* Taste. Everyone has different tastes. The finer qualities of taste even vary throughout the day, let alone over the course of a lifetime, so it’s highly subjective. But, organic produce can be grown larger than non-organic. Larger veggies, like cucumber, loose much of their flavor when they become super-sized. Distributors may be tempted to sell enormous produce, but it may not fare well in the taste category (tastes-not-so-great, but more filling). As to livestock, larger animals will have more muscle, but, as a result, may not be as tender. Again, that’s a distributor’s choice. Winner: organic, with a slight lead.
*Growth process. Organic farms use natural fertilizers like manure. The fertilizer definition
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Organic vs. conventional foods
by Roger Quinn
Organic foods have become all the rage over the last 6-8 years, with profits in the organic food sector growing steadily
by Selenna
The foods we choose can help in the prevention of many illnesses and increase our quality of life. In an effort to
by Debbie Robus
Watch the documentary film, "Food, Inc.," and you may very well vow to never eat anything that isn't organic again. As someone
by Jed Eane
As we become more aware of how our food is produced, so the debate continues to rage over whether organic produce is better
by M. L. Kiser
Organic foods, what are they and why are more and more people buying them? What is wrong with the same old conventional
View All Articles on: Organic vs. conventional foods
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Who was the better teacher and chef: Julia Child or Jacques Pepin
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Collegiate Society of America (CSAmerica)
The Collegiate Society of America (CSAmerica) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse CSAmerica's featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. S...more