There are 65 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #36 by Helium's members.
I have seen and heard many things in my life but few were as absurd as the subject question of this article.
Should America attack Iran?
Have we not learned anything from the current situation in Iraq? It's an almost daily occurrence in the war-torn nation that innocents, coalition troops and insurgents are killed. Reports from the nation almost invariably begin with, "in the deadliest day so far..." They go on to describe yet another explosion that kills people in numbers anywhere from single to triple figures. Usually occupying troops, sometimes insurgents, almost always innocent civilians.
The nightmare began with the 9/11 attacks. America watched on CNN as the aircraft slammed into the towers. She watched as the symbols of her might fell killing around 5000 people. The world condemned such atrocity.
And at this point, America chose the wrong path. In a transparent knee-jerk reaction, Bush ordered his armies of war to invade and in a show of precise force, they virtually levelled the chosen targets. Ground invasion followed and within a relatively short space of time (when compared with other wars) victory was claimed.
Things have descended rapidly downhill ever since and Bush, in an act of desperation, has committed more troops in the forlorn hope that they may be able to stem the rising tide of insurgency.
They haven't been and they won't be and realistically, the only option is to withdraw and try another way. What is that way? Well, that's for another article however what it is most definitely NOT - is attacking Iran.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran's volatile President hasn't shown anything but contempt for the West and sits almost fidgeting in his desire to face-off with the US. Like the rest of the Muslim world, he is giving those who criticize the metaphorical finger and his defiance knows no limit.
We're told he is anything from 3 to 10 years from having operational nuclear weapons, which in one way, makes an invasion attempt slightly less worrisome as it would rely on "traditional" warfare. But on the other, such warfare as demonstrated every day in Iraq, is not much better in terms of death and destruction.
So in answer to the question, "should America attack Iran?" No. If you have any desire to see your country survive another century, you will think very hard and very carefully before you attempt such folly.
America desperately needs a new strategy. And it's based on fighting fire with fire. Orthodoxy cannot and will not defeat terrorism.
Learn more about this author, Mutters.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Thomas Sowell wrote, "But if the worst that Barack Obama does is ruin the economy, I will breathe a sigh of relief. He is
by Alan Fernald
One of the gravest threats facing the world is the threat of an Iranian nation armed with nuclear weapons. To stop the proliferation
by Joey Goze
In weighing such a question, there are many points to consider. The cost of lives versus the cost of not acting. The long
by Ashley Smith
America should not attack Iran but they shouldn't have invaded Iraq or Afghanistan as they did either. The excuses at the
by Albert Pryor
Perhaps one should look at the possibility of such a conflict from another perspective. A fundamentalist state, Iran might
View All Articles on:
Should America attack Iran?
Add your voice
Know something about Should America attack Iran??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
We happen to think skating - in all forms is good for people of most ages. It is the one form of exercise that you ca...more
hide