Home > Society & Lifestyle > Ethnicity & Gender > Gender Issues
Created on: May 20, 2010 Last Updated: May 21, 2010
Two things happened recently which made me consider the bizarre inequality that still exists in our media and in life in general when it comes to breasts.
The first was seeing a man walk down the street topless. It was a rather unattractive sight; however, there was nothing I could do about it as he wasn't breaking any law. Then it occurred to me that if I, as a woman, were the one topless, I would be arrested for public indecency.
The second incident happened while watching TV program. There was a scene in a morgue with three bodies who had recently been autopsied. While the two men had the blanket down by their waist, the woman was covered to her shoulders. One wonders how that autopsy was carried out!
This got me to thinking about why it is deemed appropriate for a man to be topless but not a woman. In essence we both have the same parts. There are only two differences I can see;
A woman's breasts are generally more shapely.
A woman's breasts can produce milk.
Neither of these two facts seem to provide us with a logical reason. In fact when you consider these facts it would make more sense for women to be the ones allowed to run around topless. With regard to the first fact, even as a woman I can admit that women's breasts are generally more attractive than men's. And obviously not having to faff about with bras and tops would make breastfeeding easier. So far, no rational reason.
Now, the main point I keep coming back to is the fact that women's breasts have been sexualised in modern culture. Forgetting for a moment the fact that a man's nipples are just as sensitive and therefore just as sexual, there is one glaring point of hypocrisy. Walk into any newsagent's in the UK and sitting on shelves for all (including young children) to see will be any number of newspapers with topless women in them. Leaving aside the ridiculous notion that a half-naked woman classifies as news, I cannot help but wonder why it is okay for a woman to be topless in the Sunday papers where everyone can see anyway, but not in real life. Where exactly is the difference? I do have to confess that I am not sure whether pictures of topless women are so easily accessible in other countries. If so, then perhaps this last point will not be considered as valid; however, the first two still stand up.
The long and the short of it is that I believe that women should have the right to be topless just as men do, having one rule for one sex and one for the other just furthers inequality and hinders the feminist movement.
Learn more about this author, Cara Dack.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Why female breasts shouldn't be censored
Female breasts shouldn't be censored because doing so makes them seem inappropriate, and the human anatomy isn't something
by Cara Dack
Two things happened recently which made me consider the bizarre inequality that still exists in our media and in life in
by Rosa Sock
I'm an over analyzer. I'm an observer. So when I notice things like the fact that even with the progression of feminism
The logistics of what we call "obscenity" baffle me. Who originally decided which seven words can not be said on television?
Censorship boards have not provided sufficient explanations as to why female breasts must be censored. This gender specific
View All Articles on: Why female breasts shouldn't be censored
Featured Partner
New England Coalition for Sustainable Population (NECSP)
New England Coalition for Sustainable Population's (NECSP) mission is to raise awareness in New England of regional, national and global population and sustainability issues, and to strengthen regional action on these issues.more