Home > Religion & Spirituality > Spirituality > Theories of Spirituality
Created on: April 26, 2010 Last Updated: August 09, 2010
What if we indeed simply cease to exist? Why is that so terrible? It is exactly what we assume happens to grass, corn, roaches, squid, rats and some would even admit dogs and cats. To believe that we humans are the one and only exception to the ‘lights out’ theory of death is completely illogical. That doesn’t mean it isn’t somehow possible, just not rational, logical or probable.
To believe in life after death, continued consciousness after bodily death we have to step away from what we know, what we can see or measure and create or attach our thinking to theories that cannot be proven. In order for us to remain sentient after our brains shut down we must believe in a higher power that by definition is outside the known or knowable physical universe.
Logically if celery just dies, if insects just die, if frogs and birds and cats, dogs, dolphins, chimpanzees all just simply fade away, and we are genetically, biologically very, very similar, what part of ‘logic’ lets us leap from that point to ‘eternal life for humans’? It doesn’t. Logic dictates that the natural order is most likely, by a very large margin ‘fade to black’.
If indeed we are eternal beings, at least consciously, then why do we not remember what we were doing, seeing, and thinking three thousand years ago? Are those of us here now all simply in round one of eternal life? Or if we are eternal beings, but we are not able to recall events or lives previous, what exactly is the point of eternal life and is it really actually eternal at all? If we are not able to recall our past experiences how can it be considered eternal?
How would that be any different from just simply fading away?
We could want to believe there is more life after we die, we could want it really, really badly. We could even imagine palaces, flowing gowns, harps and halos, ghosts and wandering spirits, cosmic tribunals and eternal damnation . But these are merely imaginings. We have no reason to believe in any of it unless we just want to believe it, unless we just choose to believe it.
Odds are that logically we are much more likely to be like celery and grasshoppers and less like mythological gods.
Learn more about this author, DCBentley.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Logical conclusions about life after death
by Robyn Reece
As a non-believer it is very difficult to have any real ideas as to what happens after we die. Those who have a religion
There is no doubt that we survive after death. Centuries of accounts, documentation and research support the fact
by Vicki Brown
There can be no logical conclusions about life after death. To arrive at a conclusion, one must do research and find evidence
by James Boyd
Despite any evidence, many (maybe most) people believe that is some sort of life after death. Many of us seem to be incapable
by DCBentley
What if we indeed simply cease to exist? Why is that so terrible? It is exactly what we assume happens to grass,
View All Articles on: Logical conclusions about life after death
Featured Partner
Environment Northeast (ENE) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse ENE's featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. Share what you know, lear...more