Home > Health & Fitness > Medical Issues > Health Care
Created on: March 16, 2010
The phrase "right to health care" is ambiguous, and therefore misleading, so it deserves some analysis rather than blanket dismissal. We *do* have a right to liberty to care for our health and to contract with others for treatment. However, we do not have a right to demand that others pay for it.
This dissonance between a right to liberty and a "right" (claim) to an entitlement is at the heart of many populist fallacies. If you ever read about what "rights" populists see in the 9th amendment, your eyes will bleed. It's enough to stop one from using the word "right" in modern political debate; people just don't comprehend (or haven't been properly taught) the difference between a right (ownership claim) and mere covetousness (a desire to take what someone else owns).
However, even if it's a privilege to have the wealth to hire all of the medical services of our desires, we do still have the right to liberty in seeking the services that we can afford. Sadly, one could fill a whole book with all of the ways that American government at various levels violates our freedoms to treat ourselves and to contract for treatment as we wish.
Just one example: From the FDA to various state-level bureaucrats, thousands of Americans are being virtually murdered each year because drugs and procedures are being denied or delayed. Yet these deaths go unpunished and even mostly unreported simply because one must wait years, sometimes decades, to prove in hindsight that a treatment has been safe (enough) and effective (enough) all along.
When a desperate, terminally ill citizen has exhausted all other options and is willing to accept the risk (even risk of death) of trying an experimental treatment, by what authority can the FDA prohibit it, turning risk of death into certainty? What kind of ghouls infest the FDA that they care more about covering their own asses rather than saving lives and respecting liberties?
Don't they realize that besides hope for a cure, terminally ill patients accept risk knowing that even if they die, their deaths may gain meaning by contributing to discoveries that save others? Isn't it a RIGHT of any American, even a terminally ill one, to lay down his or her life for one's fellow citizens?
Yes, we have a right to health care, BUT... It's not the right to be patronized by politicians buying votes with other people's money. Instead, it's the right of a noble people to reclaim liberty that has been violated for too long.
Learn more about this author, Jeffry R Fisher.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Is health care a right or a privilege?
by Brett Boston
When did people start confusing rights with privileges? For instance, it's a privilege to live in a fancy house and drive
The phrase "right to health care" is ambiguous, and therefore misleading, so it deserves some analysis rather than blanket
Sickness is an inevitable consequence of being human. In order to maintain or achieve health, humans require some form of
When people maintain they have a right to health care, they are purposely misinterpreting the Constitution. All Americans
by J.B. Doyle
I believe that the Preamble to the Constitution says it best: "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Specialized care: Does it really improve care and reduce cost?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Society of Professional Journalists
Helium is proud to announce its partnership with the Society of Professional Journalists. Its members (almost 10,000 strong!) are invited to join the ranks at Helium.more