Home > Religion & Spirituality > Religious Concepts > Thoughts on God
Created on: March 09, 2010 Last Updated: July 25, 2010
Despite heroic efforts to exclude the Bible from human origins, the book of Genesis still plagues evolutionists. Unsupported "just-so" stories and explanations like punctuated equilibrium, itself a "scientific miracle," have failed. Evolutionism seems utterly unequipped to explain history.
Creationists, as a general rule, accept Genesis as straightforward history. Evolutionists do not, choosing instead a mystical beginning that features unliving elements, from parts unknown, merging in primordial goo, and magically coming to life. Such can't be observed, duplicated, or tested, so even calling it “science” is misleading. And yet, most evolutionists regard the Biblical creation story as mythology, and creationists as flat-earth mythologists. Here, then, are some points to ponder.
The Flat-Earth Myth
Some 20 years ago, Professor Jeffrey Burton Russell, researching his 1991 book “Inventing the Flat Earth: Christopher Columbus and the Historians,” traced beliefs concerning the shape of the earth all the way back to the 3rd century BC. He found no evidence anywhere of flat-earth beliefs. Clearly, nobody feared falling off the edge of the earth, including Columbus' opponents, who based their opposition on economics.
Is Baraminology Pseudoscience?
No. Baraminology is taxonomy based on the created kinds reported in the Bible. The charge of “pseudoscience” is a sadly typical name-calling tactic employed by evolutionists. Declaring something pseudoscience allows them to ignore it professionally.
Noah and the Genesis Flood
When skeptics scoff at this story, they normally raise fairly well-worn questions against it. Let's look at some.
Why hasn't the ark been found? We don't know for sure where to look. The Mt. Ararat mentioned in the Bible as its final resting place may not be the same as its modern counterpart. In addition, the ark was made of wood, and therefore valuable to Noah and his family for building materials and fuel. It's a good bet it was disassembled following the flood.
Could Noah have built and operated such a boat, gathered so many animals, gotten them on board, and controlled them? Whew! That's a plateful, but the answers are yes, he didn't have to, yes, and yes
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The debate over creation and evolution
As the scientific world celebrates the 200th birthday of Charles Darwin, and the 150th anniversary of his Origin of Species,
by Craig Wobrak
The debate between creation and evolution has raged on for some time now. From the time of the theory's inception, it has
The debate over creation verses evolution seems to be a fairly unintelligent waste of time and energy. For purposes of education,
by Justarius
The Creationism vs. Evolution debate is an unproductive use of resources. One can only hope that intelligent people
by EnnisP
Philosophy is an area of study which confuses many but intrigues us all. If you have ever read a philosophy book you know
View All Articles on: The debate over creation and evolution
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Is daily spiritual reading mandatory or just helpful?
Click for your side.