Search Helium

Home > Politics, News & Issues > International Politics > International Politics (Other)

What is the United States' position on access to clean drinking water as a basic human right and how does that compare with the policies of other countries?

Title endorsed in part by:

by Warren O. Brennan

Created on: November 07, 2009   Last Updated: November 08, 2009

Currently, the United States does not recognize a right to water, neither in a domestic sense nor as an international human right. This has placed the country's government at odds with multiple nations around the world, who have codified a right to water in their nation's constitution, as well as prominent NGOs, who have called for the United Nations to recognize the right to water as a fundamental human right.


On the domestic front, the US's failure to recognize a right to water follows in the traditional understanding of the country's Constitution. The liberties included in the Bill of Rights section of the Constitution are commonly referred to as negative rights, meaning they do not grant individual privileges to citizens by which they are able to demand goods or services from the government. Instead, the Constitution and its Amendments set out a list of actions that the Federal Government is forbidden to engage in.


This view of rights is contrary to fundamental human rights documents, such as The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which have always contained positive rights. These rights are not merely stopping blocks against government control, but instead grant onto the individual the ability to demand from government a service which is considered to be fundamental. A right to water would assuredly be considered a positive right, as it would place a requirement on the federal government to ensure that every citizen had access to water resources.


Currently, 15 countries recognize a right to water in their Constitution. They include South Africa, Spain, Belgium, and Ethiopia. Two American states have also taken upon themselves to include a right to water in their state constitution, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania. California attempted to pass a similar provision, but it was veto by Governor Schwarzenegger. It appears unlikely that the United States government will move for any legislation on the federal level for such a right, given tradition and fears that the government would not live up to its end of the bargain.


On the international level, the United States government has been characterized as an extreme hindrance to declaring access to water a basic human right for all. In 2002, the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights issued a resolution calling water fundamental. This was seen as a major step forward in water rights.

The UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) further released a resolution in 2008 on access to safe drinking

Helium Debate

Cast your vote!

Should cannabis be legalized in the UK?

Click for your side.

87008

Featured Partner

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse PETA's featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. S...more


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA
#