What is better the written word, or the visual depiction of the written word? When it comes down to the book vs. film adaptation it really is a fine line between which medium is most suitable for audiences. It all comes down to personal choice, and of course the quality of both materials.
So what are the arguments for a book usually winning over the movie version?
1. In most cases the book was penned before the script. Therefore, the book is the original material, born out of creativity and the ability of the author to communicate a tale to their audience. It is an original piece of work, and due to its popularity becomes the reason a film adaptation is made. Simply a copy is always a copy regardless of form.
2. Books are not defined by hours, minutes, seconds and budgets. Readers have the freedom to start, stop and re-live tales over and over again at their leisure from start to end without wasting electricity or having to rewind sections to catch up. Instead a book gives one the option of picking up a tale and continuing it whenever the reader likes.
3. No other costs are required once a book is purchased unlike the movies. With the film people have to pay for a ticket to see the tale once, have to pay again to see it again, have to wait another 6 months for the DVD release then pay to either hire or buy a copy. With the book you buy it from a store or borrow it from the library for free then read it over and over again without paying another dime.
4. Reading can both be a private and communal activity. Readers can take a book anywhere and become so absorbed with concentration that the world disappears. They can also be read aloud sparking discussions, questions and thoughts between people acting as a rallying point of common interest. Film of course can do this as well but not until after it has finished showing, not an issue for books.
5. There is no right or wrong way to visualise characters, places and situations, when reading. An individual takes the words on the page and forms their own mental visual picture, a situation which can be horrific when a novel is transferred to the cinema if the wrong actor is cast or the wrong set is used.
6. Films become dated compared to novels which are timeless and not reliant on technological and cinematic advancements. This can therefore lead to remakes, judgement and rivalry within the fan base of both the films and the text.
7. When a piece of written fiction is adapted to the screen sometimes the best and most important
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
What is better the written word, or the visual depiction of the written word? When it comes down to the book vs. film adaptation
by Hafsa Zubair
Can there ever really be a fair comparison between the private, enchanting world of literature and the public, epic medium
Books or movies? It's a tough one in many respects. Because, let's face it, there are a lot of damn fine movies out there.
It has long been accepted by most well-read folk that the film adaptation of a written work can not live up to the original.
Hollywood has had mixed affects on pieces of literary art. Depending on the genre, the money provided in the making, the
View All Articles on:
The book is usually better than the movie
Add your voice
Know something about The book is usually better than the movie?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
National Autism Association (NAA)
The National Autism Association (NAA) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to donate your article earning...more
hide